|
HS Code |
986026 |
| Chemical Name | 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone |
| Molecular Formula | C6H4O4 |
| Molar Mass | 140.09 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 615-94-1 |
| Appearance | yellow crystalline solid |
| Melting Point | 285-287 °C |
| Solubility In Water | slightly soluble |
| Density | 1.8 g/cm³ (approximate) |
| Boiling Point | decomposes before boiling |
| Iupac Name | 2,5-dihydroxycyclohexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=O)C(=CC1=O)O |
| Synonyms | 2,5-Dihydroxy-p-benzoquinone |
| Pka | 2.96 (first hydroxyl group) |
| Ec Number | 210-446-0 |
| Pubchem Cid | 12253 |
As an accredited 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | A 100g amber glass bottle with secure cap, labeled “2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone,” with hazard and handling information displayed. |
| Shipping | The shipping of **2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone** involves packaging in tightly sealed containers, typically under inert atmosphere to prevent oxidation. It should be labeled according to chemical transport regulations, protected from moisture and heat, and shipped as a non-hazardous solid. Ensure compliance with local, national, and international shipping guidelines. |
| Storage | 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone should be stored in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture. Keep it in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, ideally at room temperature or lower. Store away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents and bases. Ensure proper labeling, and handle under inert atmosphere if long-term stability is required. |
Competitive 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every seasoned chemical manufacturer comes across a handful of compounds that stand out for their versatility, reliability, and role in enabling crucial innovation. 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone—often called DHBQ or by its molecular formula C6H4O4—has become one of those mainstays in both research and industry circles. Our direct engagement with producing this compound over the years has shaped a distinct appreciation, not just for its specifications or purity, but for the solutions it brings to modern material science and chemistry.
Producing high-purity DHBQ on a consistent scale requires both discipline in process control and deep understanding of the chemistry at work. We rely on rigorous reaction condition monitoring during its synthesis, as bench-scale repetition never guarantees the same results at industrial scale. Watching for subtle shifts in pH or temperature has taught us how batch-to-batch consistency emerges from careful attention, not assumptions. Even modest changes in the purity of starting hydroquinone, or the reaction oxidant, ripple through to the final product quality.
We have made a practice of investing in stepwise purification and regular analytical checks, usually relying on thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography, to guarantee that the final product has the low levels of byproducts and impurities that advanced applications demand.
Users frequently ask what sets DHBQ from our line apart from others; in truth, it comes down to purity, moisture profile, and reproducibility of results. Purity levels above 99% are now an informal benchmark for a reason. Organic electronics, high-end catalysts, and advanced battery materials can’t tolerate fluctuations in compositional quality—they translate to minutes lost in R&D, measurable shifts in device performance, or loss of repeatability in production.
We also measure water content using Karl Fischer titration and report trace metal levels by ICP-OES, drawing a clear line for those applications where even sub-ppm contamination changes device performance. Granular color and physical appearance serve as field checks—deep yellow or orange signals satisfactory synthesis, while brown or black hues trigger immediate process review.
The typical model we provide comes as a powder, with a melting point around 210°C. Many researchers in electrochemistry request particle sizes below 100 microns; others in catalysis prefer custom-milled grades to optimize surface area. UV-Vis absorption profiles help confirm batch identity and share the fingerprint characteristics of DHBQ, peaking near 287 and 354 nm. Spectroscopic fingerprints often tell us more, practically, about batch performance than simple purity figures.
Since DHBQ is sensitive to atmospheric oxygen, our packaging emphasizes metallized laminates or amber glass sealed under nitrogen, blocking light and moisture ingress. These practices grew organically from repeated customer feedback—nothing highlights real-world needs like a frustrated user reporting color shift from improper packaging.
Most DHBQ requests originate from three main sectors: battery R&D (especially organic electrodes and redox flow batteries), organic electronics, and ligand precursor synthesis. In battery labs, DHBQ plays a part as a redox-active material, cycling efficiently between oxidized and reduced states. Experience shows that lower trace metal content results in smoother charge/discharge curves and longer cycle life. Researchers constantly experiment at the edges of device chemistry, so trace batch-to-batch differences in the material can make or break promising discoveries. This is no abstract concern—years of feedback and close technical collaboration have proven the point.
In electronic applications, DHBQ’s pattern of substitution—two hydroxyl groups in the para positions—confers unique electron-accepting properties. The overall conjugated π-system and redox activity suit it for use in molecular electronics, especially as building blocks for more complex quinone derivatives. Adhesion to technical requirements is key: organic electronics never tolerate the residues sometimes present from insufficient washing or incomplete reactions.
Several clients use DHBQ as a ligand precursor in coordination chemistry or as a crosslinker in polymer synthesis. The two hydroxyl groups remain reactive under common coupling conditions, giving rise to a host of high-performance polymers and metal complexes. The quality of the final polymer, whether in molecular weight distribution or color, consistently tracks back to DHBQ batch integrity. Successful projects almost always reflect early involvement between the material supplier and research teams, diagnosing issues at the root rather than through broad troubleshooting.
Comparing 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone with other similar quinones like para-benzoquinone, 2,6-dimethoxy-benzoquinone, or 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone, the substituents tell the story. We see more distinct reactivity and redox behavior based on the hydroxyl substitutions in the 2 and 5 position. In practical terms, this means more control for chemists and engineers working on targeted applications—especially in synthesis and catalysis, where these minor structural tweaks translate to order-of-magnitude changes in reaction rates, selectivity, and stability.
While para-benzoquinone stands as a common oxidant in the lab, it lacks the tuning offered by the hydroxyl groups and the associated metal-coordinating possibilities. In batteries, the extra oxygen atoms in DHBQ help shuttle electrons more rapidly and reversibly, one of the primary reasons our users choose it for emerging energy storage technologies. By contrast, the more heavily substituted chlorinated quinones serve very different markets: they bring heightened electron withdrawal and stability, but at the price of reduced solubility and biocompatibility.
We have adopted continuous improvement practices that grew directly out of this experience. Customizing our purification steps or tweaking our storage protocols many times came from observing cross-product contamination or shelf-life differences that only appeared after months in the warehouse. This real-world feedback, rather than academic reviews or third-party reports, shapes our operational philosophy.
Proving trust in a specialty chemical takes more than a standard COA. Our view is shaped by the repeated returns from long-term collaborators. For us, each production run starts from a protocol written by chemists who know what’s at stake. Trace impurity data, full spectral identity, and real-time storage logging now form a normal part of our workflow because our users demand it.
We monitor not just purity, but also the performance in simulated or partner-supplied applications. Every so often, a site visit or technical audit unearths a new source of contamination or process drift that no written SOP could anticipate—hands-on troubleshooting in partnership with experienced end users always uncovers new angles. This built-in responsiveness avoids the slow pile-up of issues that can otherwise erode product trust over time.
Many users underestimate how small production variables cascade through the supply chain. We source raw materials only from vetted suppliers, track every batch from delivery to packaging, and reject consignment when even minor inconsistencies arise in appearance or analysis. These habits did not materialize from standard operating procedures, but came via years of catching material mismatches that only presented in downstream failure.
We maintain robust batch traceability, not for marketing, but as a tool for technical troubleshooting and customer reassurance. If a production lot ever raises concerns, we can swiftly trace the material’s journey and reproduce its entire quality and analytical history within minutes. That immediacy builds trust between our teams and our users and has turned more than one skeptical first-time buyer into a long-term partner.
Chemical stability and usability rely as much on thoughtful packaging as on synthesis quality. DHBQ’s sensitivity to light and atmospheric humidity presents real storage and shipping challenges. Our process includes sealing batches under inert atmosphere and using layered, UV-blocking materials. The learning curve—spurred by seeing decolorized samples after international transit—pushed us to retire simple polyethylene bags for more sophisticated solutions. Users who received such degraded samples quickly pointed out that a half-measure in packaging undid months of upstream care.
Even our storage recommendations emerged from experience, not textbook principles. We keep finished material in climate-controlled rooms, away from sunlight, and advise users to do the same. When persistent fogging or off-odors appeared in some early shipments, a switch to hermetic sealing was the only remedy that solved the issue for good.
Few product introductions move smoothly without targeted user support. We maintain a direct feedback loop with technical users, regularly answering questions on compatibility, analytical methods, and performance indicators. For researchers unfamiliar with the subtle handling quirks of our material, we present tailored use guides based on practical troubleshooting—whether it’s minimizing ambient exposure, optimizing loading levels, or interpreting UV-Vis spectra.
Collaborative projects often highlight new performance expectations. Recent years have shown a pronounced trend toward integration into solid-state devices, where minimal particulate contamination and narrow particle size distribution become non-negotiable. In these projects, having direct access to the manufacturer’s technical staff, rather than a reseller, enabled small but crucial adjustments in production to meet evolving application standards.
Feedback from postdoctoral researchers, engineers, and experienced chemists alike drives our process adjustments. The loop closes with practical changes: a new sieve for powder consistency, modified lot labeling, or updated documentation for customs requirements in destination countries. These measures rarely get highlighted in sales material or generic datasheets, but they matter in the day-to-day life of an advanced materials lab.
Manufacturing DHBQ is not without its challenges. The oxidation reactions sometimes yield over-oxidized or under-oxidized side products, both of which complicate purification and can sap efficiency. Early on, we grappled with lost yield and labor-intensive rework until refining our process chemistry. After implementing inline monitoring and batch segregation, failures dropped, and users reported fewer performance anomalies.
Another ongoing challenge relates to market volatility in raw material pricing—majorly hydroquinone and oxidants. Market disruptions, whether due to regulatory shifts or upstream shortages, teach the value of maintaining robust supplier networks and safety stock. Rather than chase the lowest vendor offer, we focus on reliability; surviving material outages with little interruption underscores the merit of longstanding supplier relationships.
Looking at downstream users, solubility in water and organic solvents remains a sticking point for some. While DHBQ shows good solubility in polar solvents, applications demanding high concentrations or specific solvent systems sometimes push up against these limits. Users often experiment with co-solvents or tailored dispersions, and we respond by sharing internal R&D findings on solubility, aggregation behavior, and physical stability during storage.
Calls for greener chemistry have not left DHBQ untouched. Waste minimization, solvent recovery, and energy-efficient synthesis all play an expanding role in our day-to-day decision-making. We limit the use of hazardous oxidants and focus on which steps allow for closed-loop solvent recycling. On more than one occasion, users from university labs or clean-tech startups have cited our willingness to discuss waste streams and LCA data as a factor in their material selection, nudging us towards incremental process improvements.
Global regulations also shape our operational practices. Registration in major chemical inventories, proper hazard communication, and compliance with shipping codes have become standard. As a manufacturer, we view these steps not as obstacles, but as assurance that our materials reach users in a fully documented, controlled manner.
User expectations continue to evolve, with new device concepts placing tighter controls on impurity content, reactivity, and detailed batch data. Recent interest in molecular energy storage, organic computation, and advanced material metrology have driven us to revisit even minor aspects of our production and validation workflows. Requests for custom formulations—maybe doped with trace metals, or tuned for altered reduction potential—push us to remain flexible, drawing on deep technical knowledge and willingness to iterate.
We also anticipate growing demand for regulatory documentation, renewable sourcing, and digital tracking. Our internal systems already prepare for cradle-to-gate tracking of carbon inputs, reflecting both user inquiry trends and anticipated policy shifts. Staying close to our user base and keeping technical staff in the conversation remain our strongest bulwark against misalignment or missed opportunities.
Our experience making 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone reflects the realities of modern specialty chemical production—deep engagement with end users, relentless attention to detail, and a healthy respect for the demands of current and next-generation applications. The lessons, both from the laboratory bench and the factory floor, shape every batch that leaves our facility. As users continue to find new roles for this unique compound, we remain committed to supporting their work through reliable production, transparent partnership, and everyday problem-solving grounded in on-the-ground experience.