|
HS Code |
236711 |
| Chemicalname | Poly(3-Vinylphenol) |
| Casnumber | 25562-31-8 |
| Empiricalformula | (C8H8O)n |
| Molecularweightunit | Depends on polymerization (repeat unit: 120.15 g/mol) |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Solubility | Soluble in polar organic solvents (e.g., alcohols, DMF, DMSO) |
| Glasstransitiontemperature | Approx. 180°C |
| Density | Approx. 1.19 g/cm³ |
| Functionalgroups | Phenolic group, vinyl backbone |
| Tg | Approx. 180°C |
| Refractiveindex | nD ~1.58 |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
| Storagetemperature | 2–8°C |
| Polydispersityindex | Typically 1.5–2.5 |
As an accredited Poly(3-Vinylphenol) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Poly(3-Vinylphenol), 25g, is supplied in a sealed amber glass bottle with a screw cap and tamper-evident seal. |
| Shipping | Poly(3-Vinylphenol) is shipped in tightly sealed containers to protect against moisture and contamination. It should be stored and transported in a cool, dry place, away from incompatible substances. Appropriate labeling and documentation are required, following all regulatory guidelines for shipping chemicals to ensure safe handling during transit. |
| Storage | Poly(3-Vinylphenol) should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents. Keep the container tightly closed when not in use to prevent moisture absorption and contamination. Store at room temperature, and avoid excessive heat or freezing conditions to maintain the polymer's stability and quality. |
Competitive Poly(3-Vinylphenol) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Poly(3-Vinylphenol), often abbreviated as PVP or PVP-OH, holds an interesting spot in the world of specialty polymers. Over the years, those of us working with this material have developed a respect for both its unique synthesis route and its versatility in real applications. Chemists working at the manufacturing end routinely aim for reliable polymerization outcomes and consistent purity. There’s a satisfaction that comes with hitting the right mark, delivering a high-performance aromatic polymer that stands up to scrutiny in the lab and in final downstream uses.
The backbone of Poly(3-Vinylphenol) mixes the efficiency of styrenic chemistry with the reactivity of phenol groups. From a production angle, this isn’t just another commodity resin—every batch demands tight control over reaction conditions to prevent cross-linking and to guarantee reproducibility in molecular weight profiles. Regular poly(styrene) lacks the hydroxyl group attached to the aromatic ring; that little detail opens up a playground of hydrogen bonding, solubility modification, and binding interactions that pure hydrocarbon polymers can’t match.
In our plant, PVP breaks out from the crowd in its ability to adhere to surfaces and interact with a wide variety of substrates and molecules. The phenolic functionality makes PVP popular for thin film technologies, dielectric layers in organic electronics, ion exchange resins, and sensor applications. Take thin film transistors—engineers need dielectric layers that don’t leach, don’t transmit water, and anchor well to both organic and inorganic materials. Poly(3-vinylphenol) meets those needs due to the hydrogen bonding potential from its phenol group. Once you cross-link it, moisture resistance jumps dramatically, which is a big deal in flexible electronics. We measure the difference in capacitance retention over dozens of cycles, and PVP simply lasts longer than its unfunctionalized styrene-based cousins.
It’s not just about pushing product out the door. We find there’s a direct relationship between polymerization temperature, initiator load, and the glass transition temperature. Most customers request our PVP at a weight-average molecular weight between 25,000 and 45,000 Da, dissolved in either powder or solution form, depending on whether the application calls for spin coating, dipping, or inclusion in composite blends. The specifications aren’t selected out of habit. Over the years, we’ve tuned our process to avoid residual monomer and cross-linking above target levels, since those carry consequences for film formation and electrical performance down the line. Often, film uniformity and dielectric strength can slip out of specification with only a small shift in molecular weight or end group composition.
Throughout the production phase, it’s easy to tell when a batch is running well—a calm, homogenous mixture and a clear distillation step mean the downstream purity tests will breeze by. Chromatographic checks for unreacted 3-vinylphenol deliver confirmation. If it’s all within target range, the product passes to drying. Any faint off-color or cloudiness means something’s off in the process, and we pull the batch for review before it ever reaches a bottle, let alone a customer.
One of the most common comments from formulators and electronics engineers points to the way PVP interacts with metal ions and surface coatings. Unlike polystyrene, which basically ignores anything beyond hydrophobic interactions, PVP’s phenolic OH groups latch on to surfaces and provide a scaffold for functionalization. People in printed electronics often ask for a batch with a high density of functional end groups; that way, the cross-linking after film formation is easier to control and the final device structure retains performance after repeated thermal or humidity cycling.
In water purification, people appreciate the improved ion exchange profile and easier surface modification compared to generic polystyrenes. The phenolic group matters—there’s no way to get the same affinity for heavy metals or the same reactivity for further chemical grafting without it. Our production team has continuous requests for custom modification at the hydroxyl position, tailored to specific ionic species or surface-preparation steps. There’s satisfaction in knowing that, batch after batch, our process supports this level of customization.
Getting the polymerization just right isn’t as straightforward as labs might make it sound. 3-Vinylphenol can self-condense and cross-react, especially under uncontrolled heat conditions. We’ve gone through many rounds of agitation speed tuning and temperature ramp adjustments to get a batch that consistently avoids high cross-link density. Cross-linking too early lowers solubility—an easy failure mode that anyone working with the raw product will spot immediately. Once the product starts forming gels in solution, it’s a sign the batch is ruined for film applications.
Moisture is a big enemy in the process. Small amounts of atmospheric water can trigger early chain termination or react with the phenol groups, leading to color changes and reduced conductivity in the end product. The facility team checks relative humidity in every reactor space and keeps the vacuum lines tight. We invested in double-seal packing that holds up to repeated cycles, because it only takes one seal leak to ruin a column of material. Over time, developing a culture of vigilance has saved us both wasted chemicals and missed production targets.
Endpoint determination calls for hands-on skill. While reaction monitoring technologies and inline chromatography offer data, the final go/no-go decision often depends on the experienced eyes of a technician overseeing the batch. Clarity, viscosity, and color metrics all play into the judgment call. Some of the best insights come from unexpected process hiccups, like an unusually high or low viscosity that tells you everything about end-point polymerization efficiency.
Researchers and manufacturing customers highlight a few properties that matter most in Poly(3-Vinylphenol). Dielectric constant, thermal stability, and chemical functionality top their list. In our production notes, the highest demand comes from sectors developing organic electronic devices, especially organic field-effect transistors and sensors. For these, device makers trust our product because the dielectric layer performance stays consistent and predictable. The processing window is wide enough to fit the rapid pace of device iteration, but tight enough so defect rates stay low.
Printed circuit manufacturers also point to the ease of ink formulation. While standard polystyrene can be hard to dissolve evenly, PVP, with its phenolic functionality, dissolves in a broader suite of solvents. This means your process chemist has some flexibility in tailoring viscosity and drying time, which can cut cycle time in mass production and lower material wastage. Our feedback loop with customers has taught us that a reliable transition from raw polymer to ink is make-or-break for yield on the line.
On our side, Poly(3-Vinylphenol) quickly demonstrates its value in how seldom batches are returned. Skipping the pitfalls of many aromatic polymers, PVP shows better long-term aging and less yellowing, issues that often trip up polystyrene-based film layers. Back in quality control, we measure color index and dielectric loss over time. A good lot holds color after weeks of thermal cycling and maintains stable capacitance. Consistency keeps real customers coming back—no one wants to requalify suppliers due to minor shifts in polymer structure or behavior. It’s gratifying to see shipped product perform up to expectation in the field, building trust not just in the polymer, but in the hands that made it.
We hear stories from engineers and researchers working in sensors and surface modification. Many labs start testing PVP because of its phenolic core, but stay with us due to how cleanly our material coats, binds, and retains functional groups during post-synthesis modifications. That’s an outcome of process discipline at the plant. It isn’t luck—our focus on raw material selection, reaction time, and the details of drying define the outcome.
Much of what distinguishes Poly(3-Vinylphenol) from similar polymers traces straight to its aromatic ring bearing the hydroxyl group. Unlike pure polystyrene or poly(vinyl alcohol), PVP doesn’t forcedly trade off solubility for functionality—users access solvent compatibility and reactivity bundled together. Poly(vinyl alcohol) draws fans for its water solubility, but its lack of aromaticity limits utility in many sensor or dielectric layer applications. Polystyrene keeps things hydrophobic, stable, and relatively inert, but skips the chemical reactivity needed in coatings or electronic innovations.
For us, the fundamental difference comes during usage, especially in environments where precise chemical interactions matter. Take the case of fabricating molecular recognition layers: pure hydrocarbon-based polymers don’t bind effectively to many analytes. The phenolic group in PVP uniquely supports covalent or non-covalent binding, which helps sensors pick up target substances at much lower concentrations than traditional materials. We’ve seen PVP serve repeatable success in technologies aiming for trace detection of environmental toxins, because the aromatic hydroxyl lock on targets in a way polystyrenes never achieve.
Our R&D division spends time tuning PVP’s molecular structure for innovative forms, such as block or graft copolymers, always keeping an eye on the impact each change has on viscosity and surface energy. For users aiming to build multi-layer films or hybrid composites, the ability to start with a tailored polymer backbone means more precise property control at the device level. We recognize the trade-offs: adjusting the density of reactive hydroxyl groups can sway everything from film brittleness to compatibility with inorganic fillers. That’s the kind of nuance that only comes from hands-on experience with the production process and a history of feedback from field deployment.
Industry expectations grow every year. Poly(3-Vinylphenol) draws attention from regulatory agencies due to the potential for residual monomer content and solvent emissions during scale-up and drying. Keeping processes lean and emission-free takes more than just compliance paperwork—it takes direct monitoring of output vents, stepwise washing procedures, and careful waste stream handling. Years ago, routine spot checks at each stage highlighted the value of good practice over simply meeting the letter of environmental law. Today, we partner with downstream users to make sure the material winds up in safe and sustainable applications. Whether required or not, our in-house methods cut back on organic residue to keep up with regulatory standards and customer expectations alike.
Feedback from regulatory labs often focuses on trace impurities and thermal decomposition products. Our teams stay in close touch with these evolving standards, using FTIR and NMR to confirm final purity and degradation resistance. Sometimes, customers draw a line on acceptable impurity limits much tighter than global standards. Years of preparation let us address those cases pro-actively, rather than getting caught off guard and fighting hold-ups just before shipment.
Nothing beats a plant team that can answer questions about the actual production quirks of Poly(3-Vinylphenol). Real collaboration happens when manufacturing staff communicate directly with R&D engineers at customer sites. Recent examples involved fine adjustments to viscosity for a pilot-scale coating operation, or substituting specific solvents to reduce odor in a confined environment. Supplying more than a basic certificate of analysis, our technicians walk through polymer structure, reactivity, and real use performance. Reliability isn’t just about shipping on time; it’s about sharing the pathway to success with partners who use our materials at the edge of what polymer science can achieve.
We value the opportunity to support scale-up trials with samples drawn directly from production lots that match commercial conditions. More than once, onsite troubleshooting has uncovered subtle batch-to-batch variances, which led us to re-examine reaction time, initiator profile, and thermal treatment steps. A quick swap to slightly adjusted drying profiles or tighter feedstock screening meant our partners slashed rework rates by half, reinforcing trust that echoes through future projects.
Through industry cycles, Poly(3-Vinylphenol) keeps making itself useful in new corners of science and technology. Flexible electronics, environmental sensing, and renewable energy components all push material boundaries. Our chemists take pride in working with a polymer base that supports both ongoing refinements and new ideas. Requests for functionalized derivatives fuel progress and keep the business learning. Feedback from the field—real feedback tied to device performance and failure analysis—guides small tweaks to synthesis and downstream processing, making each lot a small step forward over past efforts.
Serving researchers and manufacturers who care about both purity and versatile chemistry, our facility treats each batch as a chance to reinforce the value of experience-driven production. Poly(3-Vinylphenol) continues to surprise not just for what it does today, but for the opportunities it opens up tomorrow. For us, it’s not just about supplying material, but about living the manufacturability and discipline that make industrial science work on a daily basis.