|
HS Code |
975753 |
| Chemical Name | Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- |
| Molecular Formula | C6H4BrClO |
| Molecular Weight | 207.45 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 3964-56-5 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 98-100°C |
| Boiling Point | No data available (decomposes) |
| Density | 1.8 g/cm3 (approximate) |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=CC(=C1O)Cl)Br |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C6H4BrClO/c7-4-1-5(8)3-6(9)2-4/h1-3,9H |
| Pubchem Cid | 11487115 |
| Flash Point | No data available |
| Refractive Index | No data available |
As an accredited Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 250g amber glass bottle with tight-sealed cap, hazard labels, safety data, and chemical name "Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro-" printed clearly. |
| Shipping | Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- is typically shipped in tightly sealed containers made of materials compatible with corrosive and organic chemicals. It is transported as a hazardous material, labeled according to local regulations, and stored away from heat and incompatible substances. Proper documentation and safety data sheets accompany the shipment to ensure safe handling. |
| Storage | Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from moisture, heat, and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Keep the container tightly closed and clearly labeled. Store in a chemical storage cabinet, preferably corrosive-resistant, and protect from light. Use secondary containment to prevent leaks or spills, and follow appropriate safety regulations. |
Competitive Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Producing chemicals isn’t a job that tolerates mistakes—each batch shapes downstream products, and subtle changes in a raw material’s performance ripple out to customers. Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro-, also known within labs as 3-bromo-5-chlorophenol, stands out among our aromatic intermediates because we’ve matched its specs and quality nuances to what formulators repeatedly tell us they need. Years of working with phenolic compounds lead us to introduce this variant as a reliable solution when structure and reactivity matter at the bench and scale.
Chemists often look at a molecular sketch and expect that one monochloro- or monobromo-phenol will interchange easily for another. As a manufacturer, our experience says otherwise: halogen placement in the ring affects everything from physical handling to reaction outcomes. Adding a bromo group at the meta position, lining up the chloro at position five, tweaks the electron distribution across the ring. This fine balance shows when customers move from benchtop to pilot runs. We’ve had partners see yield losses switching from a 2-bromo-4-chlorophenol analog, only to regain performance when using 3-bromo-5-chlorophenol with carefully matched purity. This is where knowing the details behind the structure means less guesswork for formulators working on agrochemical actives or specialty resins.
We don’t pick grades or decide specification limits in isolation. The model we produce for Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro-, built around research-grade and process-scale applications, begins at the lab bench. Pharmaceuticals groups pushed us for ultra-low moisture content; resin manufacturers insisted residual solvents come out during our final processing. Listening to this feedback, we set max moisture limits under 0.10% by Karl Fischer titration, and we routinely audit residual hexane, methanol, and even DMF well below detectable thresholds. Some batches require further purification for specific synthesis needs, like OLED intermediates. To meet those, we introduced a finer grind option, reducing bottle-to-bottle variability in melting range and impurity profiles. This minimizes time spent on quality investigations at the customer’s site.
A lot gets said about purity numbers—some buyers ask for “≥98%,” sometimes “HPLC >99%.” We learned long ago that two materials can both hit the headline purity, yet one causes batch failures. Over time, we mapped the impact of trace halides, coloring impurities, and residual monomer—from as little as 0.1%—on the stability of downstream synthetic blocks and final product brightness. Our long-term clients in fragrance and dye manufacture know a minor side-product can taint a 10,000-liter run, setting off months of troubleshooting. This is why we keep chromatographic profiles on record for comparison. Several times, international customers debated the source of a persistent off-color, tracing back to one batch of starting phenol. We narrow the window on those impurities, rejecting out-of-profile material, giving a known outcome with every lot. These lessons translate to less risk for formulation chemists and purchasing managers pressured on cost.
Sometimes a product’s main value shows in how tightly it can fit specialty needs. Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- proves this in niches that punish formula drift. Agrochemical syntheses use this molecule as a key block for selective herbicide and fungicide molecules. Lab-scale tests went smoothly, only to run into gummed-up reactors at process scale—often because competitor products carried lingering unreacted phenol or had out-of-spec halide ratios. Our plant process includes a final fractionation stage, designed based on feedback from a customer working on a unique phosphor ester. Their success confirmed the need, and our batches now carry assurance for this type of application by default.
Color fastness and purity mean just as much in high-value dye and pigment production. Trace organics and halogenated byproducts kill yields in these sensitive syntheses. Every time we refine a run, we log downstream customer yields and feedback, collecting data from multiple industries, like inks, photoresists, and even fragrance intermediates. This puts practical boundaries on our product, not just numbers but measured, experience-based limits that predict how it will run in different settings.
Chemical safety and handling know-how didn’t come from handbook specs. Early days in the plant, managing phenols meant learning the difference between theoretical HazCom requirements and what stops on-the-job injuries. Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- has all the sharpness you expect from a halogenated phenol. Splashes, vapor, dust—every exposure route shows up in a production setting. We learned to design sealed, nitrogen-purged transfer lines and always brief operators on skin and eye protection beyond minimum glove specs. Careful temperature control during bulk mixing came out of one supplier sending material with a small, unnoticed hot spot—causing local decomposition after sitting in storage for two weeks. We keep finished lots in stabilized containers to shut down similar risks elsewhere.
Disposal presents another set of issues. Collected spent material needs tight segregation to avoid violent reactions with oxidizers or bases. Our waste team tracks each batch by origin to cut the risk of cross-contamination, building safety into the workflow rather than tacking it on after lost-time incidents.
Buyers often ask why this specific substitution pattern, 3-bromo and 5-chloro, brings any added value over easier-to-find analogues. Direct experience answers that. The meta-bromo and para-chloro arrangement means different reactivity when stepping through a variety of coupling and substitution reactions. For example, during Suzuki and Buchwald cross-couplings, this compound allows selectivity impossible with 4-chloro-3-bromophenol due to steric and electronic influences. Fewer by-products and cleaner purification steps save hours in downstream processing and analysis. In our hands, running the same sequence on several ring-substituted phenols gave lower yields for 2-bromo compounds—a result echoed by partner companies working in API intermediate synthesis.
Another real difference: shelf-life and color stability. Chlorinated or brominated phenols can darken or polymerize over time. By engineering anhydrous conditions and running high-vacuum final drying, we stabilized our product to avoid these long-term aging issues, which can matter for users with seasonal or infrequent batch production. We ship with a COA lot history, sharing measured trends rather than generic shelf-life numbers—users have seen stable performance and appearance for more than a year under cool, dry storage.
Much of our process development came not from theoretical design but repeated problem-solving with users. Certain applications in electronic chemicals require the tightest metal-content control. We installed dedicated glass-lined reactors to prevent iron and nickel leaching, which can poison catalysts in downstream reactions. A global coatings maker ran comparison trials and found trace iron levels far below their detection limits in all tested batches—a result that moved our product from trial order to standard supply for their photoresist intermediates.
High surface area and free-flowing character matter to people staging reactions with automated feeders. Clumping and caking slow down automated lines. To address this, we ran pilot studies using different milling and sieving techniques, locking in a median particle size matched to high-volume feeders. As requests for custom grind and micronized forms picked up, we invested in flexible finishing lines, passing onward the practical benefit of easier dosing and reduced cross-contamination risks.
Exporting this phenol presents another layer of complexity. Varying customs and hazard labeling rosters mean preparing detailed batch histories and robust documentation. Over several years, we built a dedicated team to keep up with changing import rules for key regions—Europe, North America, Southeast Asia. Fielding audits from partners, we get repeated requests for upgraded traceability on everything from trace solvents to polymer bagging compatibility. We track every drum and package against production conditions, shipping logs, and in-plant safety incidents, tying it back to batch-level records accessible during audits.
Storage safekeeping gives another window into our risk management culture. Even the best-manufactured halophenol product can pick up moisture or suffer color change if left out under high humidity or sunlight. We store our product in low-light, climate-controlled warehouses, and print storage guidance directly on shipping labels. Customers have avoided multiple storage-related complaints after switching to our guidance—cutting out the waste and uncertainty of handling this sensitive compound under unknown or variable storage situations.
The manufacturing floor isn’t always the first to see the impact of a tiny out-of-spec reading—a synthesis technician or process chemist usually picks it up in their distillation results or final product tests. Over the years, we made deliberate changes after direct feedback, sometimes over hundreds of emails and phone calls across the globe. Adjusting solvent washes, tweaking purification runs, consulting users about minimum inhibitory impurity profiles, each round led to changes we built into the process. Some applications surfaced oddities no textbook predicted—unexpected crystallization behavior or fiddly filtration in a specific matrix. Our engineering team challenged assumptions about process order just to make sure a particular client could avoid extra hands-on work.
Repeat orders from advanced materials houses and specialty pharma firms tell us we built more than a commodity—each new spec, adjustment, or logistics tweak connects to a real-world outcome, not just batch numbers and analytics. We still invite customer process tours and encourage direct sampling at their lines whenever possible, using that access to keep improving how this product works in the world, not just in our own labs.
Quality control for Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- means hands-on investment—even when commodity pricing puts pressure to cut steps. Several batches, early on, revealed the cost of skipping what might seem like redundant checks. We started maintaining two independent GC and HPLC labs, catching unexpected contaminants or markers missed by a single analysis. This uncovered irregular small peaks, leading us to improve raw material pre-screening and train operators to look beyond routine chromatograms. Corrective actions came from practical troubleshooting, not just paperwork. Each cycle through this process educated on why production of even “minor” intermediates depends on real quality discipline, not just compliance forms.
More recently, our partners want to know exactly what goes into every drum and why one lot runs better than another. Supply chain transparency isn’t a value-add, it’s demanded in regulated sectors from pharmaceuticals to advanced materials. Our in-plant ERP system links every finished drum of Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- with analytical records, operator logs, and custody documentation. QA and regulatory teams get direct line of sight from raw material arrival to finished warehouse item. Several plant managers who once handled complaints about supply gaps or unexplained off-spec results now find the root causes faster and can spot issues before they disrupt a run.
Routine site visits, strict supplier vetting, and a willingness to share audits with major clients underpin this system. Many years in the trade taught that trust builds from letting customers “see inside” the process. We invite on-site inspections, remote video tours, and flexible data sharing—with sensitive information protected—so no one is unsure of the pedigree of the material they’re buying or re-testing.
Manufacturers of halogenated phenols carry responsibility beyond the fence line. We recognized that local water authorities monitored trace organics, especially after phenol-related incidents overseas prompted regulatory tightening. Investing in closed-loop water handling and vapor abatement, we slashed both routine emissions and the risk of accidental discharge. Real field data from our effluent makes clear the improvements—regulatory monitoring shows us below new, tighter standards introduced after 2020. This requires continuous retraining for plant staff, periodic independent site audits, and willingness to halt or reroute production during suspect readings. The effort pays off for both the community and customers who hold us to account on green chemistry values and long-term supply risk.
Global buyers—especially those serving personal care, flavors, and high-regulation segments—demand evidence of environmental and workplace safety controls at the origin. It’s not just paperwork. We frequently host due diligence tours and provide granular emissions and waste traceability records. This transparency wouldn’t exist if we hadn’t experienced the consequences of less-rigorous handling earlier in our history.
New material sciences and pharmaceutical breakthroughs place unique demands on building block chemicals. Our R&D partners strong-arm us to push boundaries—solubility tweaks, crystalline phase control, compatibility with high-throughput synthesis robots. The days of one-size-fits-all standards for halogenated phenols are fading. Requests for green manufacturing approaches, lifecycle audits, and lower overall waste drive us to incrementally improve every production year. Raw material traceability and cradle-to-gate reporting now go hand in hand with pilot-scale flexibility.
Moving forward, Phenol, 3-Bromo-5-Chloro- will continue to adapt. Each technical detail in production, every documented batch history, every adjustment based on feedback builds toward a more robust, transparent, and forward-compatible supply. That outcome issues from deliberate investment, transparent relationships, and never assuming “good enough” will support high-value science or competitive manufacturing.