|
HS Code |
176415 |
| Chemical Name | Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- |
| Cas Number | 39156-41-7 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H6Cl2O |
| Molecular Weight | 177.03 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Boiling Point | 261-263 °C |
| Melting Point | 68-71 °C |
| Density | 1.38 g/cm3 |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Smiles | CC1=C(C(=C(C=C1)O)Cl)Cl |
As an accredited Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Amber glass bottle, tightly sealed with a screw cap, labeled with hazard warnings, containing 100 grams of Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl-. |
| Shipping | Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture, heat, and incompatible materials. It must be labeled as hazardous, with UN shipping information if applicable, and handled by trained personnel. Comply with all relevant regulations, including DOT, IATA, or IMDG for safe transportation. |
| Storage | Store 2,6-Dichloro-3-methylphenol in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. Keep the container tightly closed and clearly labeled. Protect from moisture and direct sunlight. Use corrosion-resistant shelving if possible, and ensure spill containment measures are in place to prevent environmental contamination. Handle with appropriate personal protective equipment. |
Competitive Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
From decades on the production floor, I can say every batch of Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- tells a story. Our own operators blend experience with modern process controls, watching each reaction and every phase shift closely. This particular phenolic compound stands out for its high purity, a sharp melting point, and strong performance in applications that require resilience against chemical degradation. We recognize the effort that goes into safe handling and purity controls, and the subtle differences a few extra tenths of a percent can make at scale.
Pure Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- is only possible with carefully maintained plants. In our plant, we ensure process vessels line up exactly with all reaction requirements, not focusing just on legal purity specifications but on what downstream users have told us works best for their synthesis steps. Whether we’re talking about batch sizes or preparing sample lots, impurity profiles remain tight because getting a slightly different impurity set could mean more by-products in your follow-up steps. Silicon-capped glassware and stainless lines prevent metal leaching—a small extra effort, but critical.
Most requests for Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- come from those working in pharmaceutical intermediates or agricultural chemistry. The chemical’s two chlorine atoms and methyl group direct further reactions to selective sites, helping chemists synthesize complex molecular targets faster. It acts as a useful base molecule for coupling reactions, ring substitution, or for preparing derivatives with extended aromatic characteristics. Our own technical group often consults users on reaction run-ups, sharing which solvents or catalysts have historically led to higher yields and repeatable results on this backbone.
For many years, we shipped 10 kilogram drums as a standard, following requests from pilot plants scaling up to commercial output. We only switched to custom drop-shipping in lined pails after hearing feedback from facilities that needed flexibility and minimal handling losses. Seeing how the product interacts with different container linings gave us insight into shelf life and stability across temperature ranges—some polymorphs resist caking better, and certain lids prevent dehydration in dry storage zones.
With Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl-, it is easy to track the molecular fingerprint with modern NMR and chromatography, but users have continued to prefer batches with slight excess methyl content showing better synthesis success rates in specific fine chemical preparations. Our records back this up; last year, batches outside a 0.3% threshold led to slower or dirtier reactions reported by downstream R&D clients.
Plenty of phenol derivatives look alike on paper. In hands-on comparison, strict isomeric control makes this model reliable. Our chemists experimented with the way the 2,6-dichloro substitution directs electron flow, and the location of the methyl group always made a big difference in stability under heat or acidic workup. That’s not theory; it’s matching repeated user feedback.
New clients sometimes ask why not use a cheaper isomer or a less purified grade. Feedback from those who have tried alternatives usually returns to the same point: low-level impurities slow their yield and sometimes wreck expensive final step processes—not because something looks off on the spec sheet, but because residual solvents or by-products sneak through during late-stage synthesis. Our stricter removal of monochlorinated and non-target isomers keeps those headaches down. Every stretch of extra purification and careful product handling translates directly to cost savings and less waste for the user.
In practical terms, we see Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- going out to pharmaceutical labs building out new analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents. Its structure anchors more than a handful of lines in modern crop protection chemistry as well. One of our partners relies on it to create stable intermediates that don’t break down during storage in the presence of air or moisture—a subtle, but important, benefit over simpler phenols that lack the same backbone strength.
On these projects, the consistency we offer answers regulatory documentation needs, but more than that, it resolves unpredictability issues for scale-up teams. You’d be surprised how a change in crystal structure or a light trace of an unknown compound triggers days of troubleshooting in a downstream production run.
Institutes working on custom synthesis ask for tighter cut points and low-residue lots. Over and over, our production data and sample archive come into play. We show them full impurity scans, not because it is “required by specification,” but because, as chemists ourselves, we know the pain of tracking anomalies through long data logs.
The shift from older glass batch reactors to continuous flow models let us boost throughput and reduce cycle times on Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl-. During transitions, we learned how even slight catalyst fouling produces batch-to-batch drift. So, we built protocols to sample at every stage, not just the end. We upgraded all gas inlets to keep airborne contaminants out—most losses during drying or transfer used to go unaccounted for until we installed digital flow sensors and particle samplers.
We regularly run side-by-side pilot trials with modified flows or new solvents, especially if clients flag up stability issues or staleness with stored material. For every novel troubleshooting request that comes to our technical desk, there’s a log of process cycles that follows, linking specific procedural tweaks to actual finished product successes.
Countless chemists reach out with questions, thinking a generic dichlorophenol or a methylphenol substitute will cover the same ground. Over the decades, we’ve checked against these ourselves. Subtle differences in boiling point and vapor pressure mean a lower-grade cousin either leaves behind residues or volatilizes off in closed-vessel runs. Not all derivatives deliver the same shelf stability or reproducibility, a fact that gets overlooked by otherwise well-intentioned purchasing teams focused on initial cost.
We track very specific impurity profiles for our product: monochlorinated by-products, pad resin fragments, and residual solvents that cheaper lines tend to carry. Removing these avoids off-odors, prevents catalyst poisoning, and cuts down on time spent washing reactors between steps. Our records show that using other grades led to surprises in crystallization or lingering non-volatile residues—even a few extra ppm of unwanted by-product makes separating finished target molecules nearly impossible in some sensitive syntheses.
Our technical support team, comprised of operators with real-life experience on the plant floor, doesn’t just read troubleshooting scripts. They walk sample batches and know which production days matched which client outcomes. If a user flags inconsistent melting or color drift, our quality group pulls archived test samples and re-runs full impurity scans. Sometimes, it comes back to a small equipment calibration drift, or an unnoticed temperature surge during filtration.
Many of the improvements we made—like tightened filtration mesh sizes, and using temperature-stable gaskets—all came from problem runs that we dissected alongside our back-end customers. No one enjoys explaining why an entire campaign failed, and that shared frustration leads us to tighter process discipline.
We’re not insulated from growing environmental demands. Our handling practices for 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl-Phenol evolved under close watch from both safety and sustainability lenses. Recovered solvent streams get sent through secondary purification; leftover losses from reactor cleanouts funnel through in-plant recovery loops. Our upgraded water recycling plant and emissions tracking came about not for surface compliance, but from stories of previous batches lost to accidental contamination. Getting things right means less waste, less downtime, and a safer workplace alongside better value for our users.
The most useful insights have come from extended runs and feedback cycles with long-term partners. Each time an issue surfaced with bulk storage or shipping—be it caking, color drift, or melting deviations—we gathered specific root causes and built those lessons into updated SOPs. There’s always some new potential failure mode waiting in process transfers. We treat every unexpected incident as a place to upgrade, not just for compliance, but because we understand the headaches our partners face from poor control further down their own processes.
Manufacturing at scale means seeing touches others miss. That includes changing out a gasket type after an out-of-spec polymerization or adjusting drying oven sequences when a small shift dropped product yield in back-to-back runs. We test each tank, each lot, and make results available to the teams using our product downstream—not as a point of formality but because our staff understand from hands-on experience how much ride on details in a multi-step synthesis.
Learning from each technical request or troubleshooting session, our operational team tracks, stores, and reviews outcomes. Every tweak in reactor loading, every small filter change, and each unusual quality result gets discussed openly. We found reliable solutions not just in adopting the latest technology, but listening carefully to those who work with the product after it ships from our warehouse.
Collaborations with leading academic and industrial labs drive new requirements. As new synthesis pathways emerge using 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl-Phenol as a starting block, we see higher requests for custom impurity profiles and specialty sizing. Our production team works directly with researchers, blending historical process data with real-world pilot synthesis observations. Teams get involved not just in batch sizing and shipment, but in understanding how a subtle impurity can impact a 30-step total synthesis.
In one recent example, a pharma client traced a snarl in their purification campaign to a side product we flagged during a routine QC scan—a fragment not visible with standard off-the-shelf testing equipment. We worked out a solution together, adjusting one segment in our chlorination sequence. The improvement translated to tighter downstream controls for them and cycle time gains for us.
The culture on our plant floor recognizes that every step, from tanker reception through drum filling, affects final product behavior. That awareness comes from often-unnoticed day-to-day decisions: routine sampling, batch split testing, and team-wide discussions on running improvements. Our methods and investments track back to a goal of never sending out product that we wouldn’t trust to run our own lab processes.
Talking through these specifics, the differences from third-party or off-label material become clear. Wide impurity spreads, neglected container types, and limited production data from outside vendors lead to overlooked issues that complicate scale-ups or force rework. Authentic manufacturing experience means our operators, supervisors, and technical specialists carry a shared understanding that influences every batch.
We keep our eyes on shift signals—regulatory, technical, environmental—and maintain ongoing idea-sharing channels with every serious client. Longer-range planning includes studies on new catalysts or alternative reagent sourcing, aiming to retain the reliability you expect while refining efficiency for wider-scale adoption. Steady, open exchange with users identifies quieter pain points, leading us to practical in-plant changes that pay back over the life of years-long production runs. Future-proofing doesn’t just mean compliance; we invest because hands-on problem-solving pays off in longer-lasting, cleaner, and more effective chemistry.
Looking back at the production runs, user feedback, and all the failed and fixed attempts, our team knows that the integrity of every Phenol, 2,6-Dichloro-3-Methyl- shipment goes further than a data sheet. It’s the sum of careful plant practice, real problem-solving, and long hours under reactive synthesis lines. Our history proves that authenticity, process transparency, and mutual support define the product’s value more than any spec list ever will.