|
HS Code |
544556 |
| Name | Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) |
| Cas Number | 123519-54-0 |
| Molecular Formula | C9H13NO |
| Molecular Weight | 151.21 |
| Iupac Name | (S)-2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-methylphenol |
| Smiles | CC1=C(C(=CC=C1)C(C)N)O |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C9H13NO/c1-6-4-3-5-8(7(6)2)9(10)11/h3-5,9,11H,10H2,1-2H3/t9-/m0/s1 |
| Chirality | S-enantiomer |
| Synonyms | S-2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-methylphenol; (S)-o-Methyltyramine |
| Pubchem Cid | 124458 |
| Chemical Class | Substituted phenol |
As an accredited Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | A 25-gram amber glass bottle, screw-capped and sealed, clearly labeled with chemical name, hazard symbols, and lot number for identification. |
| Shipping | Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) is shipped in compliance with hazardous material regulations, typically in tightly sealed, chemically resistant containers. Packaging ensures limited exposure to air and light. The shipment includes clear labeling, safety data sheets, and may require temperature control, with all handling subject to relevant chemical transport guidelines. |
| Storage | Store Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) in a tightly closed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents and acids. Protect from light and moisture. Label all storage containers clearly. Follow appropriate chemical safety protocols and ensure access to safety showers and eyewash stations in the storage area. |
Competitive Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Turning Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) from raw materials into a finished product takes hands-on decisions every step of the way. Unlike commodity chemicals that roll out in huge lots with minimal differentiation, this compound steps into a narrower spotlight. Demand often arrives from labs dialing in chiral intermediates or pharma teams chasing more specific molecular blueprints. The (S)- configuration attracts interest for good reason—its stereochemistry fits into certain synthesis pathways where the wrong isomer trips up the whole reaction.
We’ve learned over time that the influence of the methyl group at the 6-position isn’t just a footnote. It shapes molecular interaction, whether in catalyst development, active pharmaceutical ingredients, or advanced intermediates. Our operators keep records on subtle shifts in yield and purity. Some mornings, a fraction of a degree in process temperature or a minor variation in solvent brand has shown more effect on optical rotation and end-point purity than specs on a paper might suggest. So lab data overlaps with lived experience—and each batch chips away at the theory/practice gap chemists talk about.
In a world packed with phenolic compounds, not everything goes far beyond the basics. The structure here—where a methyl group and an aminoethyl chain flank the phenolic ring—differentiates this product from run-of-the-mill mono- or di-substituted phenols. The asymmetric center introduced by the (S)-1-aminoethyl group defines selectivity and use-case in downstream chemistry. We don’t get many calls for this molecule from customers making resins or adhesives. These buyers want cost efficiency and basic reactivity. Instead, we’re working with researchers and companies needing a defined chirality that won’t disappear in later synthesis steps. Even for traditional uses like fine chemicals or specialty reagents, control over stereochemistry decides whether a product generates value or headaches. In our shop, the toolset for chiral separation and verification often gets more traffic on days we run this product than during batches of achiral phenols or methylated cresols.
We see manufacturers talk about specifications like melting point, optical purity, and impurities, but those values are the tip of the iceberg. Consistently achieving high enantiomeric excess tells more about your grip on the process than any standard. Chiral intermediates, as found here, need reliable column prep, accurate solvent drying, and tuning in every stage from amination to crystallization. We’ve hit snags where a gearhead component on the reactor failed, introducing a minuscule contamination. The resulting batch drifted out of compliance on a single specification, but the impact stretched across several orders awaiting delivery.
By producing every ton in-house, running QA in our own facility, and maintaining full process histories, we cut down on surprises. Adverse lot-to-lot variability, especially in products with asymmetric centers, can upend scale-up work for users. Our chemists run validation steps for tasks like HPLC, NMR, and GC chiral columns, and we’ve adopted real-time data logging, so we catch missteps before material leaves the plant. Shipments rarely hang in customs or reach customers out of spec, but if a problem ever appears downstream, the documentation and training on each batch tell us where the answer sits.
In straightforward industrial processes—making simple cleaners, building blocks, or plastics—companies don’t often need to fine-tune for single-enantiomer content. But as soon as you step into pharma, agrochemical intermediates, or any advanced synthetic route, the difference between the (S)- and (R)- forms becomes crucial. Activity, toxicity, and downstream compatibility shift with stereochemistry. We’ve worked with clients who tried to shortcut their supply and ended up chasing minor impurities caused by the wrong isomer seeping through. Recovery eats time and budget.
Offering a solid supply of this (S)-configured compound means providing not just a molecule, but a foundation for more predictable reactions later on. Whether customers expand a small-scale process to large batches or bring projects up from pilot to plant size, our team consults on potential risk points. The difference compared to generic, non-chiral phenol derivatives hits hardest at QA and regulatory steps. Audits, filings, and multi-step API production want a firm paper trail. It pays to keep product identity tight from the very first kilo to the final run.
Most requests for this compound fit into three categories: research work refining synthetic methodology, companies scaling up asymmetric syntheses, and APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients) needing a specific chiral backbone. The first group approaches with questions on detailed properties—melting point scatter, solubility in tricky solvents, or shelf-stability under varying conditions. We design feedback loops so their data flows back to us, fine-tuning subsequent batches. The second group, who scale up, push on batch-to-batch reproducibility and cost-per-gram, balancing purity with process throughput. Our direct dialog with process engineers makes sure our specs dovetail with their reactors, not just our own.
API manufacturers become the most rigorous. Certification, traceability, impurity profiling—there’s no slacking. Our internal team maintains updated documentation for each shipment, from raw material certificates to gas chromatography and NMR printouts, right up to real-time stability studies. Several projects depend on this molecule’s chirality to deliver expected bioactivity. Failures don’t just lead to wasted batches, but often full regulatory rework.
Technical data always starts with a CAS number and a molecular formula, but inside the plant, those identifiers take a backseat to interpretation. Control of optical purity—often above 98 percent for (S)-enantiomer—isn’t left to chance. Our process uses tailored reagents and chiral auxiliaries that have gone through years of troubleshooting. One subtle source of error is solvent moisture; a few parts per million of water in critical reaction steps can skew ratios enough to cause a failed run. So we keep process records not just for compliance, but because we’ve seen real losses when such details slip.
Physical presentation—crystalline solid form, color, minimum and maximum particle size—connects to how customers receive and process the chemical. Some buyers work directly from the drum; others deploy automated dissolution, so flowability and dusting affect efficiency. Finishing steps in our plant focus on lot consistency, making rework rare. Storage and shipping align with chemical sensitivity, using temperature control and inert atmosphere packaging if feedbacks flag degradation risks.
There’s a world of difference between a spec sheet’s promise and what comes off the line. We make Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) with every step designed, run, and monitored in our own facility. The payoff isn’t just specification compliance or passing a third-party audit. Our customers build new molecular entities and scale recipes for projects that end in multi-ton, multi-year supply agreements. Cutting corners early would destroy downstream value and invite regulatory headaches.
Our operational priorities come from experience, not paper theory. We’ve learned that direct communication across shifts trims misinterpretation. Process decisions—on purification cut points, recrystallization schedules, or reaction temperature holds—happen with firsthand feedback from those who know the equipment and chemistry at ground level. As hands routinely guide the work, unexpected hiccups like rapid temperature flux, local utility interruptions, or reagent purity variance reveal themselves faster, limiting waste. All this reduces the difference between expectation and result when a new batch ships out.
A handful of phenol derivatives play bit parts in specialty synthesis. A few make the leap from research to industry. Phenol, 2-(1-Aminoethyl)-6-Methyl-, (S)- (9Ci) started as a niche request from a single pharmaceutical customer before wider adoption stretched supply and sparked investment in dedicated reactors. Our team engineered new routes and parameter tweaks when increased volumes turned former trace impurities into real production hurdles. Thinking like a manufacturer keeps these projects healthy; a lab might tolerate low-yield, labor-intensive routes, but consistent supply at kilo and multi-kilo batch size brings a new checklist of problems.
We don’t run faceless lines of hundreds of specialty chemicals, nor do we pitch ourselves as the economy option. Providing this compound, in this specific isomeric form, grows from customer demand for clarity and repeat performance. Over time, repeat customers brought back feedback not just on chemical quality, but on how our approach to transparency, batch traceability, and willingness to address tough, technical questions minimized risk in their pipeline. Project managers and R&D leads see value well beyond the drum arrive date.
Each year brings regulatory updates around process safety, environmental impact, and controlled substance handling. Chiral amines receive occasional scrutiny due to broader use across regulated industries. By applying boots-on-the-ground audits, plant-level risk reviews, and regular team training, we offset the risk of regulatory non-compliance. We refuse to shortcut maintenance, even if it means offline days. Maintaining our reactor cleaning program and routinely updating SOPs guide how we keep each batch inside spec. That extends shelf life, reduces out-of-spec risks, and aligns with rising scrutiny from global customers.
The biggest hidden challenge remains raw material variability. Local supplier networks shift, prices jump, and logistics snags turn days into weeks. We’ve internalized risk planning with buffer stocks, broad vendor qualification, and direct relationship maintenance. We know every link in our supply chain—not just the names, but the true capabilities and habits of each partner. Our quality control group reviews every certificate of analysis as though failure would become a bottleneck tomorrow, which, in the world of fine chemicals, isn’t a bad bet.
We rarely face one-off requests where standard answers fit. Each project brings a challenge—maybe solvent compatibility, maybe unique impurity profiles, sometimes a changed specification mid-year based on a late-stage regulatory ask. Our approach connects process chemists and customer engineers early in the project. Hosting plant visits, sharing process updates in plain English, or running custom lab trials against unique downstream conditions—all part of the job.
Customers say our willingness to pick up the phone or reply with clear, unfiltered process feedback sets us apart. If a batch doesn’t match theoretical solubility in a new formulation, we run bench trials. If a customer project stumbles on impurity carryover, our analytical team pulls retained samples, sharing raw NMR and chromatography data. Problem solving doesn’t cut between process lines and sales teams. We own the chemistry from sourcing to scale-up. Over years, this approach builds trust and keeps new projects on track.
Looking at industry trends, more fine chemical and pharmaceutical programs incorporate chiral building blocks to meet target selectivity and minimize regulatory risk down the road. We see a shift as companies dedicate budgets to secure direct-from-manufacturer traceability, moving away from fragmented or third-party intermediaries. This compound—once a specialized product—now travels in larger volumes and clocks more hours in customer process R&D labs. We recognize the pull: more complex synthesis, tighter regulation, and rising expectations on both reliability and communication.
As more molecules in pharma, biotechnology, and agrochem step up their complexity, we see continued growth in requests for chiral intermediates with defined spec profiles. Future projects will stretch our ability to innovate—maybe around greener process chemistry or at-scale organocatalysis. Those transitions will lean on every lesson we've drawn from manufacturing, not abstract promises or rigid spec sheets.
We view every order as a partnership, carrying a value chain from raw material through synthesis, packing, and delivery, inside a managed loop of feedback and improvement. Mistakes and surprises—inevitable as they are—get tackled with direct communication, record keeping, and focus from the same people who set up the reactors and run the analytics. The payoff: batches reach customers the way we built them. Traceability, reliability, and deep chemical know-how leave a tangible mark on every project. That’s the real difference in buying direct from the source: what we make doesn’t just tick boxes on a spec sheet, it strengthens every link of your supply chain and keeps your projects running, year by year.