|
HS Code |
794989 |
| Chemical Name | p-(Dimethylamino)phenol |
| Synonyms | 4-(Dimethylamino)phenol |
| Molecular Formula | C8H11NO |
| Molecular Weight | 137.18 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 150-76-5 |
| Appearance | White to light yellow crystalline solid |
| Melting Point | 91-95°C |
| Boiling Point | 262°C |
| Solubility In Water | Soluble |
| Density | 1.13 g/cm³ |
| Odor | Amine-like |
| Pka | 9.52 |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place |
| Hazard Classification | Irritant |
| Refractive Index | 1.604 |
As an accredited P-(Dimethylamino)Phenol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 100g of P-(Dimethylamino)Phenol packaged in a sealed amber glass bottle with a screw cap, labeled with hazard warnings. |
| Shipping | P-(Dimethylamino)phenol should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from light, moisture, and incompatible substances. It is typically transported as a solid or crystalline powder. The chemical requires labeling according to hazardous material regulations, with appropriate documentation. Ensure secondary containment to prevent spills, and handle with suitable personal protective equipment. |
| Storage | P-(Dimethylamino)phenol should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents and acids. Protect it from light and moisture. Label the storage area appropriately, and keep it away from direct sources of ignition. Use secondary containment to prevent spills or leaks. |
Competitive P-(Dimethylamino)Phenol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Years spent in chemical synthesis teach you one truth: the real test of any raw material starts long before it reaches the reactor. P-(Dimethylamino)phenol—sometimes referenced as 4-(Dimethylamino)phenol or just DMAP—presents an example that separates true manufacturing standards from repackaged goods. Delivering a model with consistent molecular formula C8H11NO and a solid white-to-pale yellow crystalline appearance means much more than keeping up with paper requirements. Every batch comes with its subtle nuances, but a commitment to robust synthesis and careful purification sets a manufacturer’s material apart from the crowd controlled by traders and bulk repackagers.
Common specifications for P-(Dimethylamino)phenol keep reappearing in the textbooks: purity above 99 percent by HPLC, melting point in the expected 86–90°C range. But talking about numbers and truly pulling that level of consistency from large volumes, batch after batch, remains a craft that requires ongoing monitoring, validation, and the willingness to reject subpar lots rather than suspending standards just to push out stock. Impurities—byproducts, trace solvents, unreacted starting material—don’t just threaten the number on the Certificate of Analysis. They can lead to downstream failures in applications as varied as analytical reagents, pharmaceutical intermediates, or polymer stabilization systems. On the manufacturing floor, real people sort and refine every step, keeping an eye peeled for color shifts or subtle particulate changes that signal something is off-script.
Those using P-(Dimethylamino)phenol in their formulations tell us there is no such thing as a generic chemical source. A phenolic intermediate like this appears in several critical synthesis routes: as an intermediate for the pharmaceutical sector; in photoinitiator chemistry; as a color-developer in photographic processing; or even as a stabilizer for PVC and other polymers. Each pathway demands nuanced handling. Needs in the pharmaceutical field force us to polish away micro-impurities, while stabilizer applications may call for tighter control over dusting and caking. When a user faces black specks in a polymer batch, or dropping activity in an enzyme assay, they remember the cost of ‘just another supplier’ versus direct-from-manufacturer traceability.
It’s tempting to take pride in a label, but traceability is a matter of accountability. As direct manufacturers, our records—run logs, batch release forms, analytical curves—form the paper backbone to every sack and drum. There’s no shortcut to knowing the path your material took, and the verification possible only when production and quality control teams share data in real time. End-users, when given the option, benefit from direct line communication and access to actual manufacturing data—not just relabeled safety documents or recycled test reports.
Scaling a reaction from pilot lots to multiple-ton production lines changes every part of the operation: reaction thermodynamics, filtration bottlenecks, and especially the challenge of precise washing and drying. Only manufacturers at scale grapple with nuances—such as controlling atmospheric oxygen when handling phenolates or adapting filtration steps so that every particle size range stays inside specification. Dust control routines, solvent recycle systems, and temperature mapping in kilns aren’t just regulatory requirements—they result in a reproducibility that downstream partners count on.
Some in the market conflate purity with quality, but it’s the manufacturer’s task to look deeper. Take just the aspect of residual solvents: trace methanol can disrupt sensitive polymer systems. The shape and caking tendency, seemingly minor, can affect automated equipment. End-users often report clumping from resold, dehydrated, or reconstituted powders, but direct-manufactured lots retain their free-flowing form under tight environmental controls. These hard-won improvements deliver more than a number—they keep production lines running without stoppages or yield drops.
Spending time on the filling line, you quickly see how much the crystalline nature of P-(Dimethylamino)phenol matters. Clumping, unexpected melting, or airborne dust risks don’t just add to occupational exposure—they slow down every process stage. Our experience led us to engineer drying cycles and containment procedures that minimize cross-contamination. That way, users open every drum and find homogeneity, not a lottery result depending on where the powder compacted in transport.
QA staff on our floor monitor every batch with validated HPLC and GC instruments, not only running standard purity checks, but also hunting down trace-level residuals that could impact someone else’s reaction—often weeks or months after our material leaves the plant. Chromatograms, melting point curves, and water content titrations become part of living documentation, not just archives. Any trend, even slight shifts in impurity profiles, can signal the need for upstream adjustments—adding to our responsibility for both safety and downstream reliability.
The real safety challenge with P-(Dimethylamino)phenol isn’t only confined to processing. Safe handling involves more than ticking off the SDS checkboxes. On the floor, minimizing exposure for operators, ensuring strict dust control, and designing waste treatments to control phenol residues matter just as much as global compliance. We regularly assess improvements—from ventilation upgrades to containment of bagging lines—because protecting human health in real scenarios often outstrips published best practices.
Every direct manufacturer faces volatility in crude and intermediates markets, combined with transport delays and regulatory scrutiny. There’s no hiding behind a distributor’s buffer. Navigating supply chain stress, we put resources into longer-term supplier relationships, redundant logistics, and rigorous inbound analysis of every precursor. If upstream materials slip in quality or witness inconsistent composition, the difference shows up instantly in finished product stats. For customers, that traceability carries more trust than any guarantee printed on secondary or tertiary packaging.
In several significant projects over the years, downstream partners have asked for refined cuts of P-(Dimethylamino)phenol—say, batches processed for ultra-low water or different grind profiles. Direct manufacturing access lets us adapt on the production floor, change filtration sequences, or adjust drying time, all while documenting what actually happens. No pass-through reseller can grant that level of flexibility. This means that even for a seemingly standard item, feedback leads to continual improvement, batch after batch.
Some rely on our highest-purity specification for chromogenic substrates or high-sensitivity pharmaceutical steps. Others, developing additives for plastics or resins, appreciate mechanical handling traits that keep feeders consistent. Having spent years producing both, we know that not every application demands the same grade or handling. Honest advice about putting the right material to work, not just pushing stocks, leads to fewer headaches and more reliability across applications. Our regular interactions with downstream engineers and plant staff reveal new process challenges—prompting us to tailor our process without losing sight of overall system stability.
There’s a temptation in specialty chemicals to stretch purity past what the application requires. Each excessive recrystallization, overzealous washing, or super-fine milling consumes energy, raises costs, or increases waste. Evaluating which steps actually boost functional results for a customer’s end-use, rather than just checking marketing boxes, has helped us strike the best balance: delivering a product that performs exactly as expected without needless expense or ecological footprint.
Nobody learns more about a product than those who see complaints, oddities, or unexpected performance issues first-hand. Years spent listening to direct feedback, troubleshooting alongside user teams, and sifting through off-spec cases has deepened our practical knowledge. Knowing which impurity worsens coloration in polyurethanes, or how a mild particle size shift impacts feed systems, allowed us to refine upstream reactions and post-processing. This perspective keeps us grounded—never divorcing manufacturing from real-life impact.
Handling phenolic compounds responsibly takes continuous investment. Our team relies on closed-loop solvent systems, air scrubbing, and water treatment processes built from practical learnings, not just compliance. Sludge minimization, emission control, and waste recovery form more than a shiny sustainability statement—they determine whether we continue to meet operational and societal expectations. The forces driving regulatory action today reflect concerns that began on production floors like ours—so we place those priorities within reach of everyday operators, not just company policy planners.
Those using our P-(Dimethylamino)phenol rarely ask only about the paperwork; they expect analysts who deeply understand both synthesis and handling to support them. Our technical team comes from years of production-side troubleshooting, allowing us to follow complex questions back through chemistry into manufacturing and application requirements. This kind of accessible support—drawn from direct experience—provides a problem-solving depth not found from brokers or casual sales channels.
Safe, timely delivery means nothing if drum liners break, moisture leaks in, or inner bags contaminate the product. Watching about mishaps on loading docks and during transit has informed our packing materials and container choice. Logistics staff keep detailed records of each stage, and we regularly review shipment procedures after customer feedback. It’s this level of attention—from packaging weight to sealing technique—that genuine manufacturers can act on quickly.
We receive samples from across the globe for benchmarking, often direct from customers frustrated with variable quality from third-parties. Comparing these with our own material, consistent differences emerge: off-odors from solvent residues, yellowed or grayish powder from thermal mishandling, and in some cases, shocking particle size variation. Our response comes not from marketing claims, but rooted laboratory and field comparisons, resolved by adjusting our process. This iterative method shields end-users from recurring quality issues, which can stall entire production batches or fail QC checks downstream.
Manufacturers face growing pressure to trace back raw materials and adapt greener methods. For us, this has meant real investment: integrating alternative feedstocks when possible, cutting solvent losses, and refining post-reaction cleanups to reduce non-degradable output. These initiatives gain momentum not from policy mandates, but from the simple belief that tomorrow’s customers will scrutinize every procurement more closely. Sustainable sourcing doesn’t happen overnight, but each improvement signals a product lineage worthy of trust.
P-(Dimethylamino)phenol may carry a simple chemical formula, but the story behind each container incorporates every decision made by those actually producing it: the approaches for safeguarding personnel, monitoring quality, supporting technical queries, and honoring sustainability commitments. True value arrives not from claims, but from the accumulation of events, learning, and response at every level—visible in every batch that leaves a serious manufacturer’s floor.
Long-term partnerships depend on more than product supply. The trust that engineers, technicians, and managers place in our material comes from a clear track record, documented problem-solving, and an open line into the actual manufacturing process. Each barrel of P-(Dimethylamino)phenol we send represents an ongoing investment in people, process, and responsibility—measured one shipment, and one satisfied customer, at a time.