|
HS Code |
556841 |
| Chemical Name | 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol |
| Molecular Formula | C13H10FNO |
| Molecular Weight | 215.22 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow crystalline solid |
| Melting Point | 150-154 °C |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in organic solvents |
| Cas Number | 1674-55-7 |
| Pubchem Cid | 4202739 |
| Iupac Name | 4-[(4-fluorophenyl)iminomethyl]phenol |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=CC=C1N=CC2=CC=C(C=C2)F)O |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C13H10FNO/c14-12-3-1-10(2-4-12)15-9-11-5-7-13(16)8-6-11/h1-9,16H |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place |
| Synonyms | 4-[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methylphenol |
As an accredited 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging contains 25 grams of 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol in a tightly sealed amber glass bottle with hazard labeling. |
| Shipping | 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)methyl)phenol is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers, protected from light and moisture. It is handled as a laboratory chemical, accompanied by a safety data sheet (SDS). Transport complies with relevant hazardous materials regulations; avoid extreme temperatures, physical shock, and incompatible substances. Proper labeling ensures safe handling and storage during transit. |
| Storage | 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from sources of ignition and incompatible materials such as strong oxidizers. Protect from light and moisture. Ensure proper labeling and keep out of reach of unauthorized personnel. Store according to standard laboratory chemical safety protocols. |
Competitive 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every batch of 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol we ship reflects years in the trenches of chemical manufacturing. This compound cropped up on our development list after persistent feedback from research labs and specialty chemists pressed for higher-purity Iminophenol intermediates. Handling this molecule in production, we’ve come to appreciate the quirks that distinguish it from close relatives. Not every raw material behaves the same; some demand more meticulous control and greater care with purification. Over countless runs, our team refined techniques for handling this specific compound—choices that yield stronger batches and a more consistent profile, run after run.
Our own experience, not just what’s printed in journals, shows this compound offers valuable selectivity in downstream syntheses. Traditional imine derivatives don’t carry the same substitution pattern you’ll find here. That para-fluorophenyl group matters. It doesn’t just influence electron density; it also tweaks the compound’s reactivity and expands its possibilities as a versatile intermediate. Customers working with fluorinated scaffolds gain more options for cross-coupling than with non-fluorinated forms, a fact that emerges time and again in practical use as well as the technical side of catalysis.
Manufacturers who try to swap this chemical for a generic imine variant usually circle back after finding that reaction yields take a hit. Some secondary by-products that don’t give chemists trouble elsewhere can become stubborn if the structure’s not right. Our plant found out early that maintaining tight purity here translates to smoother production further down the customer’s line. Extra cleaning steps after the fact cost more in both time and resources, something we learned from scaling production and tracking how technical tweaks on our end reduce problems on the user side.
Industrial partners and academic researchers expect more than a print-out of analytical data. Sourcing chemicals directly from a manufacturer, rather than a trader, brings more insight into consistency over hundreds of kilograms versus the small bottle in a catalog. We moved from manual purification to continuous flow crystallization for this product after noticing shifts in impurity profiles depending on the size of the synthesis. By reenvisioning our separation steps, we held onto high-purity standards and avoided trace contaminants that would otherwise trip up downstream reactions.
A product like 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol ends up evaluated on more than percentage purity; performance under typical synthetic conditions weighs just as heavily. We lab-check residue levels after each run, knowing how a few parts per million of an organofluoride impurity can create headaches in hydrogenation and coupling reactions. Our team works right in the lab and production floor to make adjustments—whether by changing solvent grades, imposing an extra drying step, or fine-tuning temperature profiles for imine formation. If a reaction batch behaves off-spec, our logs and onsite analytical capacity let us trace origins and address issues without delay.
On any given day, chemists at formulation plants and R&D labs reach for this molecule as an intermediate in high-value syntheses. The para-fluorinated phenyl group opens more doors in medicinal chemistry than you’ll find with unsubstituted imines. We’ve heard directly from partners in pharmaceutical discovery who rely on this material in SAR screening, quickly building out libraries of fluorinated analogs, and see it in semi-bulk quantities going to specialty fine chemical plants for further derivatization. In these contexts, quality can’t slip. Trace metal content, color, and even subtle differences in the order of addition can all sway the outcome. Each time our compound flows into another synthesis, it has passed rigorous checks that reflect lessons learned through repeated scale-up trials.
This product also finds a reliable role in specialty polymers and advanced materials. The phenol functionality offers handles for crosslinking or as an anchor for further modification, especially in designing new polymer backbones with targeted electronic or thermal characteristics. Sourcing directly from the manufacturer cuts out layers of uncertainty that come with intermediates subjected to unknown repackaging or improper storage. Customers tell us time and time again, the way this material stacks up on certificate of analysis doesn’t tell the whole story—how it performs batch to batch and under routine lab practice can make or break a week’s worth of work.
Our team has collaborated with academic groups interested in using 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol in conjugated materials for optoelectronic applications. Their feedback often circles back to the importance of starting material purity when targeting high-performance organic semiconductors or related research. The consistency and transparency in supply make the difference between dozens of failed device tests and a publishable breakthrough. On the factory side, we see similar stakes, only now multiplied across much larger runs and with a keener eye on efficiency and avoidable waste.
After years running our facility, we understand the difference that direct communication and insight can make for a chemist hunting for a reliable source of intermediates. Context goes a long way; knowing which trace side products are likely to appear when switching solvent systems, or which storage conditions protect best against slow degradation, helps partners plan their work without surprises. Warehouses and third-party brokers can’t substitute for original manufacturing notes or the vigilance of operators watching each shift in real time.
Some suppliers focus solely on offering the lowest price. It’s not uncommon to see an influx of complaints about variable melting points or subtle shifts in reaction times when buyers chase quotes down the supply chain without knowing the source. Over long-term supply relationships with customers, the stronger route comes through sharing production batches, test data, and troubleshooting stories. Problems don’t vanish, but they resolve faster when the manufacturer pulls from actual operating history.
Our approach includes full transparency in terms of process controls, batch-to-batch documentation, and rapid technical support with any unusual results in downstream chemistry. If customers report anomalous spots on thin layer chromatography or odd color in recrystallization, we start with the raw material’s own production record and offer real input—no runaround, no canned responses copied from datasheets. That record of trust stems from the commitment to deeper engagement than pushing out the next shipment. We’ve worked out best practice recommendations on storage, solvent choices, and process modifications through problem-solving alongside researchers and process chemists.
Years of production runs and side-by-side analysis have shown the unique fingerprint this compound brings to advanced chemical synthesis. Not all imine or phenol derivatives perform at the same level, especially when requirements tighten from early research-scale work to final pre-commercial pilot runs. Many off-the-shelf imines skip the para-fluorophenyl group, which sacrifices the tuning power that comes with introducing a fluorine substituent.
In synthetic planning, minor differences in structure dictate major changes in reactivity. Other imino-phenol intermediates often deliver less clean separations during workup. We’ve compared runs where this product’s symmetry and substitution enabled chemists to avoid labor-intensive purification, compared to more basic or less-substituted alternatives. The fluorinated variant resists certain side-reactions that plague unfavored analogs, limiting the need for scavengers or repeated column chromatography. Our quality controls and production experience taught us how those small shifts save money and technical labor, especially with larger-scale production.
This compound also holds a stronger position when late-stage fluorination isn’t practical or cost-effective. Some researchers try to introduce fluorine through alternate pathways later in synthesis, but our own process data and partner reports show that using a pre-fluorinated material from the start gives better overall efficiency. The direct route avoids by-products, lowers waste, and often results in higher yields for the desired end material.
Closely related phenol compounds serve as decent starting points in simpler applications, but lack the same performance under challenging reaction setups. We’ve found through trial and error—which batch yields hit specification, which synthetic routes stall or generate problematic residues—that 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol earns its value most on projects where purity and predictable reactivity are critical.
Working daily with chemists and plant managers taught us that every intermediate carries a story. It’s tempting for new producers to treat chemical building blocks like beans in a bag; the reality on the factory floor tells a very different story. Every time we modify a synthesis route or tweak a purification step, we remember why each adjustment matters. If a customer’s downstream coupling doesn’t match the literature, it’s rarely about the glassware—it’s far more likely to track back to something subtle in the starting material’s profile. Years of facing up to these details made us choosier with every in-process control, every bit of operator training, and every storage guideline we issue.
We believe in real engagement with those who depend on our products. For this compound, we’ve documented the best results come from starting with high-purity raw materials, fresh batches, and matched-handling guidelines established by back-and-forth with customers and the chemists walking our shop floor. Our technical staff knows—the closer the relationship with the end user, the faster a technical win turns into a commercial one. That’s why, even in volume production, we hold onto the discipline and records that shaped our early days developing specialty fine chemicals.
Pressure mounts in every corner of the chemical industry to pursue greener, safer, and more energy-efficient processes. Our experience building up the supply of 4-(4-Fluorophenylimino)Methyl)Phenol gave us plenty of insight into ways to improve. We reworked waste streams for solvent recycling and cut unnecessary steps in our isolation processes. Avoiding broad-brush “sustainability” claims, we focus on tweaks that shave off non-essential inputs and build a more robust, reproducible product. Over the years, we shifted toward closed, monitored systems that not only keep our operators safer but result in cleaner and more stable intermediate output.
Some downstream users want even tighter specifications, low residual solvent levels, or more traceability for regulatory filings. Our data package includes LC-MS, NMR, and elemental analysis on representative batches, along with tracking all critical control points in the process. Every adoption of these stricter controls stems from collaboration with customers and adapting what we’ve learned as problem-solvers, not just as shippers of bottles and drums. Real manufacturing, as we know it, means standing behind every batch—tracing root causes of any hiccup and owning the solution until the customer’s process runs smoothly.
The story continues to unfold as new applications surface in pharmaceuticals, electronics, and specialty polymers. Every successful outcome for our partners in synthesis circles back to what we’ve built over years of direct manufacturing experience: conviction in detail, persistence in technical problem-solving, and the humility to update processes as customer research drives the next wave of requirements. That’s the role of a real manufacturer, and it’s the approach that keeps us refining not just this product, but everything coming off our lines.