|
HS Code |
374655 |
| Chemical Name | 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol |
| Molecular Formula | C7H6O3 |
| Molecular Weight | 138.12 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 533-31-3 |
| Iupac Name | 3,4-methylenedioxyphenol |
| Appearance | White to pale yellow solid |
| Melting Point | 102-104 °C |
| Boiling Point | 313 °C |
| Density | 1.36 g/cm3 |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Smiles | C1OC2=CC=C(C=C2O)O1 |
| Pubchem Cid | 128825 |
As an accredited 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Packaged in a 100g amber glass bottle with a secure screw cap, labeled “3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol – Analytical Reagent Grade.” |
| Shipping | 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol is shipped in secure, airtight containers to prevent exposure to air and moisture. Packaging complies with chemical safety regulations, including UN labeling if applicable. The containers are cushioned to prevent breakage during transit. Detailed documentation and safety data sheets accompany each shipment to ensure safe handling and compliance during transport. |
| Storage | 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol should be stored in a tightly sealed container, away from direct sunlight, heat, and sources of ignition. Keep it in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, isolating it from incompatible materials like strong oxidizers and acids. Proper labeling and secondary containment are recommended to prevent spills or accidental exposure. Always follow relevant safety and regulatory guidelines. |
Competitive 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every day on the plant floor, we touch raw materials that play a significant role far beyond our fences. 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol stands out for its consistency, versatility, and the real impact it brings to a range of downstream syntheses. Few people outside of production stay up at night thinking about what purity actually means, or the headaches a trace of residual metallic impurity can trigger in a multi-step process. At our facility, these concerns direct every batch, every analysis, and every decision we make about shipment and quality release.
Not all 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol looks or behaves the same. The differences begin with the feedstock selection and run through each step of our process. Our operations team has stuck to a refined method that minimizes side reactions and produces a consistently pale powder—avoiding color formation that points to breakdown products. We use minimal amounts of corrosive reagents, and do not rush the extraction procedure, because shortcutting even a single temperature ramp can set off a domino effect of off-odors or loss of yield.
Years ago, we wrestled with false peaks in HPLC results because of packing contamination from reused columns. After much frustration, we built the practice of using dedicated lines for this product and calibrating equipment just for its unique signature. This discipline keeps our content above 99% by HPLC, which allows our customers to rely on the same profile every shipment.
3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol, known by its CAS number 533-31-3 for those in the trade, has particularly strict requirements if it is to support downstream synthesis in the pharmaceutical and fine chemical sectors. In practice, stringent control over water and ash content matters more than you’d guess from reading generic spec sheets. Our water content remains locked below 0.2% by KF, sidelining the sticky problem of hydrolytic degradation in condensation reactions. As for heavy metals, we do not settle for loose limits; batch records confirm levels well below common thresholds, since we’ve seen what even a trace amount does to catalytic processes further down the line.
In our facility, each specification ties to a real-world effect. Lowering the limit for iron content came up only after one of our customers reported unexplained color in their product stream. We doubled the frequency of raw material screening, tracing the issue to a seemingly negligible aging tank valve. That adjustment cost us some convenience, but eliminated a recurring headache—illustrating how deeply our own experience colors each line of our technical data.
Chemists recognize 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol as more than just a building block. Being part of so many challenging syntheses—from bioactive intermediates to antioxidant agents—gives us direct feedback on how purity and stability impact the finished product. Take, for example, the way this molecule provides a key step in producing benzodioxole-based pharmaceuticals, flavors, and dyes. We listen closely to customers who need robust reactivity, and that comes only when every impurity sits below detection.
Its use as a starting material in the creation of catechol derivatives puts a spotlight on subtle contaminants. We’ve seen firsthand how late-stage chlorination or alkylation steps can amplify trace metals or oxidized byproducts, causing failed reactions or loss of batch value. That’s why we treat every kilo of 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol as a mission-critical material, not a commodity to be traded on price alone.
It helps to spend time on the differences between 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol and similar molecules such as catechol, guaiacol, or vanillin derivatives. All carry specific functional groups and similar molecular backbones. The methylenedioxy bridge, though, provides greater electron delocalization, tuning the chemistry required for specific coupling reactions or oxidative stability. In our production, we’ve noticed this bridge reduces the tendency toward rapid polymerization, meaning longer shelf life and less reprocessing.
Guaiacol comes with more volatility and odor, making it a near-miss for some sensitive syntheses where olfactory qualities matter downstream. On the other hand, catechol’s pronounced lability makes storage and transport trickier, since it oxidizes easily without stabilizers. In contrast, 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol provides an optimal balance—reactive enough for substitution chemistry, but sufficiently robust for multi-month storage in tightly sealed drums.
Comparisons only carry weight when they connect to what happens outside the lab. We’ve shipped both 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol and closely related phenols to the same customers over the years. Nothing tells the story like a consistent yield improvement in a customer’s hydrogenation process or a sharper chromatographic profile in their finished flavors. We use these practical reports to fine-tune our own specifications, avoiding the temptation to stick with generic tables or lowest-bidder approaches.
Most of the 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol leaving our site finds its way into multi-step syntheses. A large portion gets diverted into the specialty chemicals field, forming benzodioxole rings or other complex structures for potential bioactivity. We know from our years following customer projects that even a single batch deviation can ripple through R&D timelines, so our lot-based quality tracking stays transparent and open to scrutiny.
Some users prefer charging it in solvent from the get-go, avoiding issues with dust or static. For them, we offer a predissolved option upon request, using only high-purity solvent and performing the same set of release tests on that solution. This alternative grew directly out of conversations with process chemists looking to cut one step out of their charging protocol, and we responded without adding unnecessary fillers or co-solvents.
Not every issue shows up in a certificate of analysis. Years back, a shipment faced customs delays due to an unfamiliar labeling format. Since then, we embedded regulatory document review into our dispatch process, sending every outgoing order through legal and compliance channels before it hits the truck. This foresight slashed our customer’s downtime and helped us understand the real-world stakes for something as mundane as product paperwork.
Dusting remains a persistent challenge. Plant operators know that fine, crystalline powders resist pouring and increase the risk of product loss. Frequent cleaning and the use of closed charging systems stem directly from our firsthand observations. We switched to lined fiber drums, and reduced airborne particles on our filling stations by over half. This move didn’t just keep our staff safer; it prompted multiple customer visits where we shared our findings, helping their handling teams save time and cut losses.
Another day-to-day headache takes the form of batch-to-batch color changes—often from overlooked micro-contaminants or shifts in humidity during storage. Responding to these, we scaled up our moisture analysis before storage, and extended packaging dehumidification periods. While these adjustments introduce cost, the payoff comes in shipping out powder that stays true to color standards demanded by customers making products where visual consistency signals quality. It goes beyond lab reports—trust gets built by showing up with the same appearance, month after month.
We see ourselves as more than just a supplier. Sometimes a customer brings a new application—such as an emerging green synthesis pathway using 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol as a phenolic scaffold for alternative oxidation. Instead of letting them run blind, we offer detailed insights from our most recent production trials. Our specialists can draw on over a decade of cumulative lot release data to flag which variables might bring undesired reactivity in their system. One partner discovered unexpected catalyst fouling; sharing our stability and trace element results helped them solve it directly.
Supporting formulation for specialty polymers brought its own challenges, since residual organics influence cross-linking and cure profiles. After fielding these questions, our lab team audits every batch for expanded impurity profiles, going beyond industry-typical aldehyde screens. Such close collaboration keeps development cycles short and cuts reliance on complex work-arounds.
In chemical manufacturing, wherever a gap exists between assurance and reality, process interruptions and customer headaches follow. We’ve learned the hard way just how much misplaced faith costs. An entire day lost to troubleshooting can mean thousands in scrapped product or missed production slots. By holding tight to internal standards, we spare our partners from late delivery of key intermediates. Their loyalty reminds us that reliability carries value all its own, beyond what price tags or brochure copy capture.
Consistency stems from person-to-person accountability at all levels. Our operators review logs for anomalies before clearing the next batch; our analysts compare fresh chromatograms against running average baselines to flag variations before release. Each action reflects a collective understanding—if 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol doesn’t meet expectations, someone with a name, a role, and real experience stands ready to correct the course. We don’t leave anyone guessing about lines of responsibility on our team.
The last few years created a shift in how raw material markets feel pressure. The pandemic and global logistics headaches led to spikes in pricing, longer delivery times, and unpredictability in everything from solvents to specialty phyto-chemicals. Our commitment to holding inventory and developing parallel suppliers shields our customers from these shocks as much as possible, though we still see sudden spikes in input costs from time to time.
Sourcing for superior feedstock rests not just on price, but consistency and regulatory standing. Many alternate suppliers push the limits of what’s technically “within spec” to chase margins. We sidestep those offers, remembering the lessons of past disruptions where our customers experienced whole-batch write-offs due to fluctuating upstream content. Instead, collaboration with supported, transparent suppliers gives us a stable foundation for long-term contracts, which we’re happy to pass on through reliable deliveries and batch transparency.
Packaging matters too. Shortages forced us, and our peers, to trial alternative packaging formats during periods of scarcity. These trials taught us the necessity of stress-testing each new closure and liner with actual product, under multiple humidity and temperature cycles. A leaky drum cap or oxygen-permeable liner wipes out days of effort, so we now maintain a rolling buffer stock of approved packaging in addition to finished product itself.
Sustainability drives real change. Over the past decade, attention to environmental controls has risen not as a marketing afterthought, but a necessity. Each batch of 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol traces back to specific certifications on effluent treatment and waste minimization. Our plant spent years integrating closed-loop solvent recovery and minimizing washwater to reach current standards. The cost shows up in more complex process controls and periodic equipment downtime for preventative maintenance, but also in sharply reduced waste outflows and a cleaner facility for everyone involved.
On the regulatory front, changes in chemical control lists, labeling requirements, and international transport rules now affect how—and how quickly—we ship orders. Our compliance office remains engaged with incoming regulations, submitting data and working with industry groups to clarify gray areas on transport and exposure limits. This close work means fewer surprises for our customers, and less risk of product being stalled at borders.
We never stop adjusting. Feedback loops span production, logistics, application support, and customer returns. Every deviation gets a root-cause investigation, and every improvement—however small—makes its way back into our batch records and SOPs. From larger filtration meshes that unclog downstream reactors to revised solvent sequences reducing byproduct carry-over, these refinements arise not from theoretical optimization, but from daily contact with real-world problems and their resolution.
Internally, we invest in analytical upgrades. Expanded GC-MS capabilities, tighter HPLC methods, and cross-validation protocols let us track even previously invisible impurities. These upgrades don’t just support regulatory statements; they directly protect customer syntheses, allowing for proactive issue prevention rather than damage control.
The most effective feedback we get often sounds blunt, direct, and grounded in operational reality. Line chemists who call out shipment damage, batch discrepancy, or paperwork lags help us stay on course much more than any abstract survey. Our philosophy centers on open, fast communication—real people on the other end of the phone or email, not just forms or auto-replies.
We believe in showing our work. Anyone using our 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol can request full production and test traceability. Any question about prior lots, packaging, or compliance can lead directly to the operations team that managed it. This direct line shortens troubleshooting cycles, lets us respond honestly, and minimizes repeat errors for the next go-round.
Our experience manufacturing 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol tells its own story of adaptation. Mistakes made, processes refined, and customer trust earned all reflect a broader pattern in the chemical industry. No two production runs return exactly the same feedback, and rigid adherence to every metric in a static spec sheet ignores the value of operator know-how, pragmatism, and the willingness to invest where it counts.
Choosing 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenol from a manufacturer who stands by every drum means more than just ticking regulatory boxes. It brings a recognition that every step, from raw materials to release, shapes not only the product itself, but also the business and the reputation of every downstream user. We keep learning, keep sharing, and keep improving—because in chemical manufacturing, that’s the only real solution to the challenges tomorrow may bring.