|
HS Code |
526091 |
| Iupac Name | 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]phenol |
| Molecular Formula | C19H24O5 |
| Molecular Weight | 332.39 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 58894-24-5 |
| Appearance | Off-white to light yellow solid |
| Melting Point | 168-172°C |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water; soluble in organic solvents like DMSO and ethanol |
| Smiles | COC1=CC(=CC=C1O)CC2=CC(=C(C(=C2)OC)OC)OC |
| Pubchem Cid | 5310880 |
| Synonyms | Dimethoxytrimethoxyethoxyphenol |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protected from light and moisture |
| Logp | Estimated 3.6 |
| Chemical Class | Phenolic ether |
As an accredited 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | White HDPE bottle containing 25 grams of 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]phenol, labeled with chemical name, CAS, and hazard information. |
| Shipping | The chemical **2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]phenol** is shipped in sealed, airtight containers, protected from light and moisture. It is packed according to standard safety regulations for chemicals, with clear labeling, and transported at ambient temperature. Appropriate hazardous material documentation and handling procedures are strictly followed during shipping. |
| Storage | 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]phenol should be stored in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture, in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Keep away from heat, ignition sources, and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Refrigeration (2–8°C) is recommended for long-term stability. Ensure proper chemical labeling and restrict access to trained personnel only. |
Competitive 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol did not show up in our reactors overnight. In the early days, a noticeable demand began emerging from research teams working on specialized molecular scaffolds for pharmaceutical and plant protection studies. They looked for structures that stuck out by resisting unwanted side reactions and displaying chemical behaviors that more common building blocks simply could not manage. This compound, with its phenol core and a trimethoxyphenyl ethyl group, kept turning up on these smart chemists' wish lists.
Some might notice how the three methoxy groups on the terminal phenyl ring set it apart from its close relatives like plain phenylethyl phenols. Those ether substituents not only push up electron density but also add a layer of solubility and chemical resilience that many synthetic intermediates sorely lack. Our decision to scale up this particular combination of features was guided by direct conversations with end laboratory users who had burned through too many hours troubleshooting analogous compounds that just wouldn't cooperate in multi-step synthesis.
Producing 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol on a lab scale teaches many lessons but getting it ready for (semi-)industrial outputs is a different challenge. The transition from milligrams to kilograms exposes many headaches others skip over in journal papers—stage-sensitive impurities, trace water, and batch-to-batch consistency.
We built our process around a batchwise methylation sequence that handles the 3,4,5-trimethoxy protection with less than 0.5% overalkylation. Careful stage-by-stage workup means we avoid common traps, such as demethylation from acidic quenching or blotchy color bodies from under-washed aromatic residues. A practical synthesis routes intermediate through a well-defined haloaromatic and manages the ethylation with tailored base conditions, always checking that we stay clear of dialkyl artifacts that gum up downstream applications.
The product leaves the dryer as a fine, off-white to buff powder, controlled for moisture well below 0.1% and minimal residual solvent. We keep the spec for HPLC purity over 98% with defined limits on minor byproducts. The packaging—double polyethylene liner inside HDPE containers—keeps air and light at bay, which turns out to matter more than expected for long-term storage.
Synthetic chemists, especially those mapping new pharmacophores or acting in lignan-mimic development, always bring up the same pain points with similar phenol derivatives. Some bring out their notebooks, showing how unsubstituted or less-methylated alternatives keep stalling in downstream alkylation and binding studies. LogP and solubility matter when scaling runs for structure-activity relationship analysis—one more methoxy here, or a phenol there, can make the difference between a product dissolving in a test tube or sticking to glassware.
Analytical teams report that compounds sporting the 3,4,5-trimethoxy motif offer crisper peak separation by LC methods, while the phenolic OH enables selective derivatization for tracer or tag introduction. They also mention the reduced background interference on UV detection compared to more heavily conjugated analogues. Not everyone needs this, but the ones who do find the difference unmistakable.
Scale-up groups hammered home the issue of stability. In heated or high-pH conditions, many competitors' phenols degrade, especially during work-up or solid-state storage. By adjusting the methoxylation and fine-tuning hydrolysis parameters, we consistently get a product that will stand up to isolation on a 10-liter scale and survive weeks in an ambient stockroom.
Between this compound and its simpler analogues, several clear differences emerge once someone gets hands-on. The presence of methoxy substituents on both rings shifts solubility dramatically. While internal QC lab colleagues have run side-by-side tests, it turned out that the trimethoxy compound dissolves freely in polar aprotic and many protic solvents down to 0°C. Less-methylated congeners, by comparison, tend to crystallize or oil out during cooling, leading to unpredictable yields or product loss in pilot runs.
Process engineers in custom synthesis operations see the difference in filtration speed, washing ease, and product dryness. In our real-world work, the trimethoxy group helps prevent the sticky, tarry intermediates sometimes found with less protected aromatic ethylphenols. A dryer, powdery product packs and dispenses more reliably, and it weighs out cleanly—an important daily frustration avoided in high-throughput labs.
End users developing small-molecule inhibitors and antioxidant mimics have told us they count on robust phenol reactivity, especially in the presence of sensitive or redox-active intermediates. Here, 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol offers measured oxidative stability without giving up the reactivity necessary for downstream coupling. Standard phenols or mono-methoxy derivatives too often oxidize prematurely or give murky, multi-component byproduct patterns under light or air, complicating isolation and slowing up new candidate discovery.
Every new run starts with the basics—powder in vial, measure solvents, mix, heat if needed. For a chemist tasked with a multi-step build, knowing that this compound dissolves and reacts as expected on every attempt means experiments stay on timeline. In syntheses targeting ether or ester linkage, the 3,4,5-trimethoxy motif encourages selectivity in addition reactions, raising overall yield figures compared to unsubstituted phenyl analogues.
Researchers working on polymer additives appreciate the compound’s clean melt behavior. We have seen this material blend with polyesters and specialty plastics for property testing, without the color drift or decomposition many substitutions impart. This keeps final products clear and meets visual QC right out of compounding, lowering repeat work and waste.
In pharmaceuticals, intermediate manufacturers depend on tight reproducibility. Our clients report a clean, predictable outcome from classic reactions like Friedel–Crafts alkylations, oxidative couplings, and mild deprotection steps. Reaction monitoring by LC-MS comes back with single-digit byproduct formation, a far cry from the kind of messy chromatograms littered with unexpected extras seen in related phenols lacking the full trimethoxy group.
Agrochemical developers choose this compound for its distinct mix of lipophilicity and aromatic structure. By modulating polarity, they can cross biological membranes more reliably, supporting delivery studies in both plants and pest organisms. Our ongoing collaborations with teams exploring phenol-based leads for new crop protectants have pointed out that just one missing methoxy makes other compounds far more prone to plant tissue breakdown, a result that can mean the difference between a hit and a miss.
From the plant floor, one doesn't get much patience from those who need a batch that just works. Early trials with this molecule frustrated our shift techs—unexpected foaming during work-up, fine droplets clinging to reactor walls, color shifts that did not match analytic standards. Processing experience teaches the value of temperature control and steady agitation. For this compound, ramping methylation steps, and running an extended water wash phase, keep trace colored impurities to a minimum. We introduced a staged solvent switch for the final wash, using a cold, low-polarity rinse to clear away oily residues that hide in more conventional DMF or methanol-only steps.
Moisture removal, especially after filtration, opens another set of lessons. Early batches stored in regular polyethylene bags began picking up faint, sour off-notes after only three months. Tying off the packaging inside a low light, low humidity enclosure now preserves both odor and analytical profile.
We keep constant communication with pilot customers, building cycles of feedback and improvement. Suggestions led us to experiment with alternative drying sequences and introduced in-line particle size checks. Smaller, dispersed particles avoid caking and allow for straightforward redispersion, especially in automated prep and weighing systems. Investing this time pays off—return rates for off-spec product now sit at the lowest levels we've logged for any specialty phenol derivative.
Conversations about chemical supply never stay just on the bench. Environmental and compliance teams want to know about the fate and transport of each molecule, especially as regulatory frameworks keep evolving. Fortunately, 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol falls outside the scope of many hazard classifications that cover more reactive or halogenated phenol analogs. The extra methoxy groups tend to dampen acute toxicity, and none of our standard protocols trigger red flags in waste water or incineration management.
It matters that customers get every shipment with the environmental paperwork that matches their compliance needs. All routines for manufacturing and waste handling follow the latest local and global statutes. We collaborate with partners and regulators to monitor for any changes that might impact permitted disposal or storage, keeping clients informed instead of letting them scramble at the last minute.
Volatile organic emissions during production get scrubbed and monitored directly—years ago, this was handled just by hood fans, but today's standards require direct capture with locally installed carbon filters. This brings more certainty to community and environmental safety and matches what downstream customers expect to see during supply chain audits. Waste minimization takes priority, allowing us to recover and recycle significant portions of the spent solvents, as well as any unreacted starting materials.
It seems easy on paper to find “just another” phenol derivative. Old hands in pharma, polymers, and agro never expect miracles from new supply contracts. Yet, our support team fields fewer routine complaints and more specific improvement requests with this compound. Synthetic teams learn that they no longer need to run extra clean-up steps or burn time troubleshooting ambiguous NMR signals. Compound handlers in pilot plants see fewer batch-to-batch variations and more confidence in long-term storage. Some come back just to share data: pointing out that they saw sharper yields or cleaner assay returns after a switch from their historic sources.
Not every customer uses this molecule in huge quantities. A research group working on SAR libraries may take 50 grams a year, but they want every shipment to match their previous stock exactly. At the other end, industrial partners can rely on orders in the multi-kilogram range hitting the mark every time—no “lot lottery” or unwanted surprises. That reliability is not just a focus; it’s what earns us the renewal of contracts and, sometimes, tips on improvements that become standard quickly.
Markets do not stand still. Scientists keep changing their focus as soon as one new therapeutic lead or polymer property gets identified. Our product and process teams keep their ears open for what’s coming next—requests for modified analogues or more stringent purity demands are already arriving. Some are experimenting with block copolymers, others try phenolic ligands in catalytic cycles, and a few ask about sustainable feedstocks for future batches.
As sourcing expectations shift, tracing every input and process step gains importance. We log every lot, annotate changes, and archive batch analytics to answer questions from both customers and auditors. Sometimes, this extra layer of oversight raises costs or adds days to shipment, but the bigger cost comes from lost trust if mistakes get through.
Our technical staff keeps pushing to improve recovery yields, cut energy use, and trial greener solvent systems. Sometimes, that means minor process tweaks; other times, it involves partnering with academic groups or process engineers open to real-world validation, not just theory. Our ongoing investment in bench-to-kilogram piloting has taught valuable lessons—most notably, field feedback from end users uncovers subtleties that careful lab testing sometimes misses, such as long-term discoloration, caking sensitivity, or effects on bioactivity in live cells or plants.
Open communication has become the best driver of improvement. Regular check-ins with customers, combined with technical support that answers specific process questions, cut troubleshooting short and keep operations moving forward. We extend the same openness to our upstream suppliers, verifying that each input meets evolving standards and keeps our downstream output reliable.
Collaborating on optimization projects often brings up new ways to use or modify 2-Methoxy-5-[2-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)Ethyl]Phenol. By sharing field examples and troubleshooting practical issues together, our clients frequently improve not only the efficiency of their synthesis but the performance of the molecules they discover. Some go on to develop modifications that push beyond the original compound, using it as a springboard to entirely new chemical space.
From order sizes measured in grams for R&D to hundreds of kilograms in advanced manufacturing, the focus remains on a reliable, practical, and user-responsive product. By keeping process transparency, environmental awareness, and customer feedback at the center, we deliver a molecule that supports both current applications and the innovations that tomorrow will require.