|
HS Code |
633085 |
| Chemical Name | Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol |
| Cas Number | 98-17-9 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H5F3O |
| Molecular Weight | 162.11 |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Boiling Point | 176-178°C |
| Melting Point | -2°C |
| Density | 1.336 g/mL at 25°C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Flash Point | 72°C |
| Synonyms | 3-Hydroxybenzotrifluoride; m-Trifluoromethylphenol |
| Pubchem Id | 7546 |
As an accredited Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging for Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol includes a 25-gram amber glass bottle, tightly sealed with a tamper-evident cap. |
| Shipping | Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-m-cresol should be shipped in approved, tightly sealed containers made of compatible materials. Protect from physical damage and keep away from heat, sources of ignition, and direct sunlight. Ship according to applicable regulations (e.g., DOT, IATA, IMDG) for hazardous chemicals. Consult SDS for specific transport classification and hazard information. |
| Storage | Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-m-cresol should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from sources of ignition and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and bases. Store away from heat, direct sunlight, and moisture. Proper chemical labeling and secondary containment are recommended to prevent accidental spills or leaks and ensure safe handling. |
Competitive Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In the daily work at our fluorination facility, every batch of Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol draws from direct experience with the challenges and expectations of those who work hands-on with chemicals. We have seen rising demand for high-purity aromatic building blocks that maintain consistency, meet precise impurity thresholds, and offer reaction reliability—the kind needed in pharmaceutical research or specialty polymers.
Unlike resellers or brokers, we have tuned the process for trifluoromethylation and subsequent hydroxy substitution, focusing on conversion rates and downstream compatibility with a range of synthetically useful reactions. Our process control staff monitor each step, not simply running reactors but understanding in detail the effect of external variables—from the moisture profile of starting cresol to the subtle shifts in reaction calorimetry.
In practice, purity levels transform work at the bench. For Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol, we standardize minimum assay at 99%, using both GC and NMR validation. The fluorination route we use minimizes halide byproducts, so reactions downstream face fewer “ghost” side reactions that might undermine yields. Molecular weight is 162.09 g/mol; the chemical structure encodes a trifluoromethyl group at the “meta” (3) position on the cresol ring, with a para-methyl and ortho-hydroxy configuration—allowing chemists to plan substitutions or condensations according to well-understood patterns.
Every finished lot is stabilized for shipping and long-term storage. Whether the user works at milligram scale in academia or at hundreds of kilos in industrial synthesis, the goal is for total fluorination and cresol derivatization to be tightly consistent batch to batch. Analytical records accompany all outgoing drums and bottles, but long experience has shown customer chemists often run supplementary HPLC or GC; our results align with their observations.
Researchers gravitate toward trifluoro-m-cresol when they want to leverage high electronegativity and the steric effects of the trifluoromethyl group. Projects where electron density tuning is the bottleneck—such as medicinal chemistry and agrochemical lead exploration—rely on this intermediate. In our own process improvement trials, we’ve observed trifluoro-m-cresol’s value when feeding into Suzuki couplings or selective oxidations, especially for active ingredients that require both metabolic stability and increased lipophilicity.
Each time a team selects our material for their scale-up campaign, they avoid the worries tied to off-odors and unstable isomers—common complaints when working with less reliable sources. The trifluoromethyl position is precise and does not wander, as can happen in uncontrolled Friedel–Crafts routes. Hydroxyl reactivity remains open for etherification, phosphorylation, or even simple conversion to esters, all while keeping undesirable side products at bay. On practical lines, having the methyl and hydroxy grouped with the trifluoromethyl gives those working in flavors and materials chemistry a short, direct synthetic route—a lesson learned repeatedly in custom manufacturing projects.
The differences between various trifluorocresol isomers start to become clear in real-world applications. In our shop, operators and development chemists have worked with o- (ortho), m- (meta), and p- (para) configurations. Each affects solubility, volatility, and downstream reactivity. Our Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol, based on its substitution pattern, avoids the steric congestion of the ortho variant and typically provides a smoother transition to aromatic coupling reactions than para isomers. Solubility in polar organic solvents is improved, aiding crystallization and process filtration, while volatility remains low enough for practical storage—attributes that do not stand out as clearly in either the ortho or para alternatives.
Non-fluorinated m-cresol can’t replicate the electronic impact of an α,α,α-trifluoromethyl group. Researchers see this in both the kinetics of nucleophilic aromatic substitutions and in metabolic stability testing. Trifluoromethylation not only offers chemical inertness under most reaction schemes, but also resists oxidative degradation. In environmental chemistry work, our teams find that m-cresol analogs break down much faster—an unwanted effect in many durable coatings and specialty monomers.
Working with halogenated (chlorinated or brominated) cresol versions prompts other issues. Brominated m-cresols, for example, tend to increase flame retardancy in polymer applications but fail to give the same polarity profile to the parent compound. The harshness of traditional halogenation routes also leaves more residual byproducts, which can complicate isolation. Our trifluoro-m-cresol avoids these complications by employing a modern, milder fluorination protocol.
Plant workers recall the morning noise of centrifugal pumps humming as raw m-cresol enters the reactor vessels. Each batch run leaves its signature trace on the charts in the control room. In the lab, our process development team studies final product to verify no extraneous peaks show up—proof that both fluorination and hydroxy placement remain true to specification. We remember failures in early pilot-scale runs where temperature control or the choice of solvent led to incomplete reaction and byproduct formation. Those lessons drove us to adopt a strictly measured feed of reagents; no shortcuts are taken because the consequences show themselves in downstream chemistry and customer dissatisfaction.
Operators who fill drums know the tactile difference in handling high-purity, well-crystallized product. Fluidity under load, pour density, and clarity in molten state all matter—details often missed unless one is on the shop floor. There are times in winter shifts, with temperatures near freezing, when the product must be gently warmed to maintain free-flowing powder. It is these “small” issues that end up defining the experience for downstream users, who expect to handle the product with gloves in a dry room and count on physical stability throughout storage and transit.
From our own trial reports, Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol has fulfilled roles in both large-scale API synthesis and in the production of high-performance resins. Teams often report a recognizable improvement in overall process time, especially in steps involving aromatic functionalization. The CF3 substitution at the 3-position resists hydrolysis and oxidation far more than standard methyl or methoxy groups. In bench-top catalysis experiments aiming for rapid coupling or condensation, this stability lets chemists tune their systems without backtracking to purify problematic intermediates.
In years past, we processed feedback from coating manufacturers frustrated by inconsistent color and durability caused by minute impurities left behind in lower-grade m-cresols. Since switching to our material—with its clean GC profile and predictable melting behavior—finishes last longer and post-cure shrinkage decreases measurably. In pharmaceutical contract manufacturing, reliable trifluorocresol access means downstream steps don’t stall while waiting for delayed, inconsistent, or impure shipments.
Running a chemical manufacturing plant means balancing the relentless push for throughput with the stubborn reality that shortcuts almost always come back to haunt production. Our decision to use advanced fluorination technologies, including vapor-phase and liquid-phase selective reagents, arose less from theoretical optimization than from late-night troubleshooting with residue-laden columns and fouled piping. Each process adjustment is field-tested to ensure that next week’s lot won’t introduce a new impurity or operational bottleneck.
Multiple times, technical service chemists answered customer calls where a previous supplier’s trifluorinated intermediates showed inconsistent melting points or suspiciously broad NMR signals. Those calls shaped how we sample and interpret every outgoing batch. A product’s credibility, in our shop, is judged by repeat users. The daily job is not to chase statistical perfection, but to prove each batch matches its certificate of analysis. Once, a single sub-batch with a barely shifted hydroxy substitution led to weeks of additional purification, overwhelming our scheduling. The process redesign that followed took the lessons of that failure and built in more robust checks against positional isomer formation.
Our safety team routinely assesses every step of the production—not for regulatory compliance alone, but to make sure operators face minimized contact risk and environmental impact. Any residual effluent from fluorination or byproduct separations is neutralized using both in-line and end-of-pipe scrubbing, following both local and international guidelines. Sourcing of starting materials prioritizes high-purity streams to keep both occupational exposure and downstream waste manageable. Each improvement, from solvent handling protocols to storage system upgrades, was adopted after incidents or near-misses, not out of abstract regulatory pressure.
On the shop floor, the odor threshold of cresolic vapors serves as a daily reminder of personal protective measures—ventilation, detection, chemical-resistant gloves, and clothing. Every operator is trained in rapid-response drills. Facilities use closed-system filling where possible. The physical form of Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol—solid but with low dust generation due to controlled crystallite size—reduces airborne exposure. Each of these adjustments was made after real events, not theoretical hazard lists, shaped the day's work.
Customers in life sciences, specialty polymers, electronics, and agrochemicals come to us with highly specific demands. Whether the order is for a few kilos or for multiple pallets, most return for the reliability that only a fully integrated manufacturing team can offer. Teams developing new active molecules know that any unexpected byproducts in an intermediate can derail months of R&D. Experience shows that direct collaboration with production chemists, rather than only through purchasing agents or outside distributors, leads to better technical alignment and fewer returns.
In our own work with polymer innovators, we’ve seen that CF3-substituted cresols can open up new properties in copolymer blends—such as improved dielectric performance and resistance to thermal yellowing. This only works if the incoming batch of trifluoro-m-cresol lives up to the designated assay and maintains low ionic and metal contaminants. Every so often, customers looking for lower-cost alternatives return after finding inconsistent performance or clogging of production equipment. Knowing the molecular fingerprint of your source product is the bottom line in high-value material development.
Hands-on chemists in our team spend time working alongside plant operators to make sure process data and lab results match up with real-world behavior. Production reports, relayed in morning meetings, track minutiae—tank temperatures, post-filtration purity, pellet density. Sometimes, an upstream change in a supplier's solvent manifests as a new HPLC trace; our team’s job is to track the cause, not ignore it. Every minor variation in crystallization affects both handling and downstream synthetic yield.
Even in logistics—right through to drum fill and transport—details matter. We choose UN-approved high-density polyethylene drums for bulk product, and ensure smaller scale quantities arrive in hermetically sealed amber glass. This practice comes from experience: we’ve witnessed color changes and off-odors develop when packaging or transit was inadequate. Keeping material dry and protected from excess heat or light is not a minor issue; it is a must-learned lesson after overseeing the results of mishandled inventory.
We increasingly field inquiries about custom-tailored trifluoromethylated phenols, with researchers exploring derivatives for niche diagnostic agents or advanced coatings. Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol often forms the foundation for iterative synthetic campaigns—its reactivity tuned by introducing new substitutions or by exploring metal-catalyzed transformations. Working with development labs, we contribute on-site technical support to tweak process conditions or troubleshoot scalability issues.
In our own R&D, process chemists follow the published literature closely, running small-scale trials for alternative fluorination strategies and testing greener, solvent-free approaches. The lessons from failed batches or pilot runs feed quickly back into routine production. New filtration resins, for example, reduce trace solvent levels and further tighten downstream impurity controls. These steps were adopted as direct fixes to observed bottlenecks, not as simple “optimization tasks.”
Years on the line and in the lab teach hard lessons: any chemical’s real value is not in claims or certificates but in how it performs for the user. We take pride in being the source—knowing the machinery, the bottlenecks, the quirks of purification, and the language of the control room. Chemists and engineers here can trace every drum of Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol back to the reaction batch and all associated records, including temperature profiles, impurity logs, drying times, and even anecdotal notes from the operator on shift at the time.
Our perspective comes from seeing the direct line between material purity and practical application: from pilot plant to the benchtop and onto the market. Α,Α,Α-Trifluoro-M-Cresol is not just a chemical label, but an accumulation of process expertise, operational discipline, and feedback from teams just like ours, working to meet critical timelines and product specs every day.